Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3441A907F for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:47:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFlKvBPjII1H for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE6B1A00DB for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([195.149.218.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQiB3-1aOOwz1IHF-00U6XJ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:47:00 +0100
To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
References: <BY2PR03MB44236EF33376F8C2BB135E8F5AF0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <533A97B6-F83D-4DBD-A015-81CD438EAE5F@oracle.com> <6E34B5BC-3E23-4E0F-8008-93797B15EB84@ve7jtb.com> <A52BE40A-DEF2-48D6-9612-5BD035104DDB@oracle.com>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <56C5D96D.7000805@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:47:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A52BE40A-DEF2-48D6-9612-5BD035104DDB@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bsLEbrAPHRJklss1MeOiopxbuPS07b4fP"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VPcr4Pr6ptO+QB6FVyGE5U62CqXWk014wIhTCznWNYdurdfHTeD t3pEppEGVo2U2DSwf4J2ipsJBz8cnGru1sNh4u1/V/YFkf4Vy/dJffAIt4YQsYpCHgg0gQT LvBPfAGpt3yVc08JGvf8f398U74MkghuKB017BVZlS9GKB8bnCYpnCYCXriblpKmR05wnzd fxvMd1i/IAhM5kk3JKx+A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4MZffgFvJnU=:41vhb/sBTUeUcwqbxFUU9H i+FH2XQP/Nletva0VnhMLycrdIhwHR6n3hVg+NsCU32D3w6M1Zd9bug/RQSG9y4oB/O589rVw Xx2UtUro3gG8gGb9j2DBfMO/3T+pOhhnTXQ1Dz65jmxb4ocf2YqYeBeaG+ntU1r7Ei5xAYUV+ jz2pVrG1mZZOKCOfw+8TY4BWFROFHUGTUMfwwYz9SR8f3SMRiIAqmUnFZVKTw+7/1OpiILucQ RnnOlc9MxMDFuze0NFmTCuLAUFC8ObENwATwgBAy4RixJZq/JDovm+puF9h8gMe7+Zg3vvO2R 4BZPSJNwUHrLDKLUsu/qyGkhXz6tQ7MGAE+fFpjAu76bS5qur41KntDUBJ2T98jcdfR5+z8fz 9BkSmvOb8rDODSWrKMfZbcS0iI2io6WLXdQTmZxiI5E2/SO31CDdnjUJvta+U443iOtHCdnVO 5YzWOfjKA70xgdnVW8tdxSnPDO+q10BjDZNVF/p4/EZaJFBS9t5o+hQwv5taM0RfZ3RMlPTYC HEbcoA4myE+5Hi8RciF07Vy4vIXBFeWix8zWEJjNIjVS+9YOZ8JVzonz9IBZcsJd5ISVtC1Di XRcwTNfurvX2z594CNVgRetmNGyN526wgpD0wzq93FG6ztJQWWniiJVIGGh8i1VDyNGaTGJ7B P7VkZlO+T9nSoO4JxVgy8KNE0RwI7F3P5Dfn0b4zjOJ9NeyPORSExWfo8K6Ce0QaIUXaciafz UPChOSC62axhlTg1H+VRVu1BpKpJfDmTVBUWbpGIzG/pUnC4M2Dxn/o+0ak=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/gdvk4SQi-lGBaVMnXC6EIWIk82k>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:47:08 -0000


On 02/18/2016 03:06 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> BTW. I think we are FAR from Last Call on this topic.

Thanks for your feedback, Phil. As you have seen I had issued a WGLC
prior to your message based on the claim from the authors that they
believe the document is finished.

We will, of course, take all reviews into account and see where we are
with the discovery spec. I, as the shepherd, will also do my review and
I encourage many working group members to also take a look at the
document and to provide their input.

Ciao
Hannes