Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting
David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com> Wed, 16 June 2010 06:06 UTC
Return-Path: <recordond@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438C33A6AA8 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.841, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENbWdOhTDUUH for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094933A67CC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1332580iwn.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zFG2FFQUyxx6Mdim9Bnf7IPl7VYO12UjruFVuoS1ffc=; b=wJxfj+4Wvvy1TYj8d0jninkBenZQQEy/2IBfFvd3cCfaIcFeto8bHzTAFEOjh4DUS8 lOlSKXgGCVJ+vWH/EntptIjT5g3pJkSLcW1ONrFVwUHYRNDBlGShvUX4VBDsj1gOIDxv r0aluVGskqmlh7j+lkIgJtZWhVim9Df1L5SL0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NzGOgp35QpAGHDTDJEt2IsCvIHRU4nL/hLEIiXIPtIHpInD2RLaqjuOvvkgD6h/gs3 w54I0zBREcTsKtEML1U8xo5Hd/m7v5tStguWAm7+61EbDgIV3xGRnBMgTE9Kx4PFiBE6 jftcG/vWd80alFLRnOR+gL6peT/gQkmShQ0Yk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.49.6 with SMTP id t6mr8190736ibf.144.1276668384464; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.192.4 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502B29B75@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502B29B75@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:06:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTil4BX_8npSqNjKvq4cdAc9K6SZGWY_TurHFonZz@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com>
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:06:24 -0000
Hey Hannes, Thanks! While I realize that the meeting lasts for the full week, I'll have a hard time being in the Netherlands for over two week days. I don't know what other people's schedules look like, but I'm guessing that a fewer number of longer time blocks will be more useful than shorter blocks spread out across the entire week. I made a poll to see what day(s) people are planning to be at the meeting in Maastricht. (If you're not planning to come, please still respond to the poll but just don't check any of the days.) http://www.doodle.com/t593i5yc76furdt6 Thanks, --David On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Those who attended the last IETF meeting noticed that the actual working > group slots are quite short (around 2 hours). The feedback I got was > that this does not leave us with enough time to get work done. I > understand that argument and acknowledge that not everyone wants to > attend a punch of other working group (even though I believe it would be > useful todo so) and therefore staying the entire week does not make a > lot of sense either. Traveling to a remote location for a 2 hour meeting > then does not sound super efficient. > > The plan I had discussed with Blaine is the following: Once the final > IETF meeting agenda is available we will pick time slots all over the > week (one every day). I will organize a room and we can get together to > discuss open issues until we reach a point where we need to dig into the > details (often requiring text to be written). Writing such text > contributions will then happen afterwards so that we can continue our > discussion during the next slot. > > This will hopefully help us to get some open issues investigated in > detail and to have text proposals available. The official working group > meeting slot would be used to summarize the work on the text proposals > and to get input from the larger community. > > Thoughts? > > Ciao > Hannes & Blaine > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Hannes Tschofenig