Re: [OAUTH-WG] PoP document: IPR Confirmation

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCBB1B5C60 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9qRzgFhr4JZ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com (mail-qg0-f54.google.com [209.85.192.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57B541B5B99 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so30957818qge.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=heRscVyWcg0mbVGL68V78GE4hmUZ3YR74PZmpt9rxts=; b=H/t0HaF4/RnZ2ouKCVAasqFd6ht2KARPVWJREWeD6WVnqxuABApbzdTGaMPHpCDUCu UcRp5uxcb2I5aJguIpKOyKldvCmNtFZUqWKyRcYwJchq68FXRORTV30/YK6RNEUgkSvg OzPILtHaopHFIhYRD0gqz+N1In/5y9NqkKJRtRLX3VDNesWRVJYQTSUR+UnBPKoeKWJg jgl8ruie6Bu6daQDZaWlp2nG1hOFsCHGCUa0eHyC5XKknvvAeMfIzODPU7axaBQPwtuR 4o6JBoLCIsvegIfF8TfMzx4SQ8rfRyvDT3IMpYysJSeTHiqzt3aV1j7dEsSsKw4FroQF lo8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+Gi+tlmzEUlvr9rCynAWy+4TRx+C3kXK7gkzxiuHePd509WXk2RFsTV+tKMG2IBRhxliC
X-Received: by 10.140.194.148 with SMTP id p142mr3691882qha.84.1443610388317; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.216] ([191.115.19.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm158052qko.13.2015.09.30.03.52.36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_720BE79C-0E69-4B52-9470-65C6137099E7"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <D231D31F.1E09A%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:51:45 -0300
Message-Id: <A0CDD393-DB20-46C6-AF94-2C024641B8F6@ve7jtb.com>
References: <D231D31F.1E09A%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/hK3AxaGaNaaS4DC4nN_NebLuvyU>
Cc: Michael Jones <mbj@microsoft.com>, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] PoP document: IPR Confirmation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:53:11 -0000

I confirm that I know of no IPR that reads on this specification.

John Bradley’

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike, John and Hannes,
> I am working on the shepherd writeup for the PoP document:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04 <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-02.txt>
> One item in the template requires me to indicate whether
> each document author has confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR
> disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78
> and BCP 79 have already been filed.
> 
> Could you please confirm?
> 
> Kind Regards
> Kepeng
>