Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 30 June 2011 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468C911E80DE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTAQiE5qDvby for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F36B11E80A7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywp31 with SMTP id 31so1332411ywp.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ln/XAj7oU7YkY9C4Sc6ILilfpiupt+8sAU8h8TQjtx4=; b=twXtyKvtDzSjSA1sMK/DpJeTg3XlzEboBQ3vbDjAHaPMZxXweL9wtPQXFzZc+4ANPk Ttj02VJPYwmMzEyLeJmjE3ea3JBR5o65YRHFW2o85BSaHSCSkNuYTf47NG9YCKW0bUBE /GDiAf0XlBmcRHBL1q+kHccPKZrHqTMQtAwc4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.24.10 with SMTP id b10mr2325903ybj.93.1309466350037; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.125.20 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikqnCicNPqZau03sJDCSOb0XPj65A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD07FA11BF28@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <CA24EAA9.1BEC5%cmortimore@salesforce.com> <BANLkTikqnCicNPqZau03sJDCSOb0XPj65A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:39:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kPS-AAzBOjgE7LFszbJbUQuvp1Y
Message-ID: <BANLkTikT+RzyK0FN=-r8UZ1a9Q8tBybKNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:39:11 -0000
Chuck Mortimore wrote: > A number of us in the community have been working on a general model > for the use of Assertions in OAuth2 for both client authentication, as well > as authorization grants. We’ve reached general consensus on a doc > that I’ve published as a draft This document is intended to replace the SAML and Bearer Token documents, and those two will then be "profiles", defining specific assertion mechanisms. We would like to have them submit the restructured doc as a working-group document before the 4 July deadline, so we'd like to get any objections to this approach heard by 3 July. I'm sorry for the very short notice, and you can blame that solely on the chairs. Chuck posted the draft about two weeks ago. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mortimore-oauth-assertions The editors can answer any questions you have about how the document restructuring is being done. We will approve draft-ietf-oauth-assertions for submission as a working-group draft, pending consideration of objections. Again, please have a quick look (it's short), and post objections by 3 July. Thanks. Barry, as chair
- [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review Barry Leiba