Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a
William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 19:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2300021F876A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bvHjveycTyfu for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38E421F875E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:37:37 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.27] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:37:37 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:37:37 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 478487.37998.bm@omp1027.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 76345 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2012 19:37:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1344973056; bh=x+ljUhBdCYG/jZqbKA9OgfUcmR2hi89XqKIikRJpfNs=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kf2eQOOKjRZXdi9N1i0lN8U80CYm4sWe9V8tTvzl0H3gkxkok8BIRhOdkeA9HwINMhvsZnt2wcatbaE8Ilh07a81Xk8lfnyK9UyYLbHqtIDAZ/jXC9Z5BixqtpbLgIx+IaYGiLElkqvDVzjLQrqXrAAabe+dPLde718qHZxcEXs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JU1qK08c7t/3/mkFpkTfeALUMc6hB6pFfY08jfyyrveGsWT4YVIO6sR2uRp9uJVWcLXyRH2kG1dVFTbt+DcscAKehYIpiuJ0q3uUadQdhKesgSXsnJwapP6LMJhVkN0qyGD4oBArlO11vqBqsu0+xIxaCMJFUMYH1Hy2b/tEb5c=;
X-YMail-OSG: yh884LoVM1kWAUO1qK50acIR1VkUqfuNXuhkvQAxNtVvNy0 I0f8gu2fOO5ij.f_owoLVHuPM2rwv8v5ccHn7cD8sfzB8pZeXAmmtLx9PrWv 4255V4GVnAayTHaRnRyCMRzG6m4ELDEcCSbJ7mkpOsekAmGDXhTXup9fclVi C.pdQopQItKyZ3XApoIPYgdZhZqcPRf2oLeitjBkdrYzf5J_ZAA.1a9jzzA4 h3DyRsMJFcpn0vID63cksAPX7yyFKGMSlvzOcObQj0NhGAlwvJB9OEyTjJt5 3itJoVmCKreBtqNiBDz6Pzrsm7KtIs.OkmTku.bRizRpMCPr5nwnc_Z9VHvV TQc4uFEDSSXaFR7OEGyNP3b0V85_KiigUVSjrFn1V8.RavHJ2nubzBam3AVc VStSK4Sh9y28UpTPNvFKEUbK.tIRo.rO0GfAlT8HudYdY11hVOx6F7.qY0E4 uu5L2EM4hRSJ9iaH977KHMTrqIB8UHvO5NVolXF1j4NLhx.0QfOPdTphtB_7 6YA--
Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:36 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416
References: <1344972117.60342.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777A7F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <1344973056.51964.YahooMailNeo@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:37:36 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, O Auth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777A7F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1458549034-1198625634-1344973056=:51964"
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:37:38 -0000
It's for the OAUTH SASL spec. I've been writing it with the idea that OAuth 1.0a would work (since I think we'll have extant 1.0a typ[e tokens we want to allow for IMAP), but several folks were saying when this all started that 1.0a was dead and I should not refer to it. I want to make sure the SASL mechanism is build to properly handle signed auth schemes and not just bearer (cookie) type. -bill ________________________________ From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> To: William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>; O Auth WG <oauth@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:28 PM Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a What problem are you trying to solve? From:oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of William Mills Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:22 PM To: O Auth WG Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a What's the general opinion on 1.0a? Am I stepping in something if I refer to it in another draft? I want to reference an auth scheme that uses signing and now MAC is apparently going back to the drawing board, so I'm thinking about using 1.0a. Thanks, -bill
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Ryan Troll
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig