IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OAUTH-WG] Security area review

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Sat, 06 August 2011 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8949A21F875E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 00:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.895, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OekgUYLelWq for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 00:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67B8821F8764 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 00:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25104 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2011 07:30:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.21) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 6 Aug 2011 07:30:14 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT003.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.21]) with mapi; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 00:30:14 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:29:14 -0700
Thread-Topic: Security area review
Thread-Index: AcxUCkhjqPDQ6LCfRJq7Xce6UpkIXw==
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96P3PW5EX1MB01E_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:29:56 -0000

Did the chairs issue a last call request to anyone in the security area? I thought the whole point of moving this working group from apps to security was to increase the review and participation of that area. So far I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate any such contribution. I would like to know what actual actions are being taken to turn this promise into reality.

EHL

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email