Return-Path: X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA0A21E8099 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.307 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.309, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2vt4OTyWrwg for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.139.52.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E216A21E8086 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:54:25 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.167] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:54:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1050.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:54:25 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 195693.3612.bm@omp1050.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 30453 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2012 19:54:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1344974064; bh=RUhFhUwzueTM9pr18uT+7sWUv7Ao4wasxYI1bNHiAjA=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fmIwf9bQaziDSRKJRlHTH1e8DPl0VnAgJuPEBi/BYOs8bLUGdwg/aWJdMctt3VU82b8eJmLjbQiXDoxQi/1FYU5awNQEFHjWOFlpemPWzJt1nooD7qEgNVp+xmpAabBF27S2J4j/Eqe3zzVFlAQI8MeWjxXEpSivIwTDKaojBFw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KaKCpToTBf5JgjLGhUKehTrDCXgzzaHQS1xd+oBvOLt5z7VI/SpSpB1pzj1baPiQNoZB0DSdwf2IGH9+7tDOXnLldqW0Q5shNfbe9rVn7j6bL0OI1KKX7rqmXak+BnUGqPhrfpckjLnGNsJMwIGSZnw+felTXeVN3QQ6VmZEjVY=; X-YMail-OSG: tKRShNYVM1na27AVEj0gJYsDI.HblH_vIOpY7c70SibvYR3 4ATtPW8Yu8qtE4t8iVt9Y1hHBslgSfGiUDeUZxC50XBCYOYdDIqM8B.YXu2T FxQSPs625jp55bMAy2kzp2.2dt6zCLZ8IHn4zVMspon3e1QVL88YkV16iOjR ari0NTwZim9ciebjdtyacC.YGejfsMxOkQWP2Btv8e4rb.Yc1HoeErQoPM8R B3uXnFh2azTCY0NmgNnzO7_Ned2SGJYcQZrGpf5VsJqLxQMz8KtN_0cjboxe whXHcm9i5c4VRilKqHZvdCY96AOIoQgRtXn7JJdHtbFhe0fnt3.W4guxXSSj Op5NrvLERdIs5StpHiE04iT4VxMimUL8QLbpRyVSM6mIkMPKw1CMM_6_InoO HovBTI5SVJ3H.XRDrzlTjIuZ9G9hNhA_RHjbOUwYhsVn.SyK_1LB8KkQR2KB rojFRuDNM6KuN4bQJLop7w8sukhdAthGX98SvYWaLBkOPDu8.wOaRA7aKYjc uQ5U- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 References: <1344972117.60342.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777A7F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1344973056.51964.YahooMailNeo@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <502AAA2D.1050404@lodderstedt.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777BBC@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> Message-ID: <1344974064.6561.YahooMailNeo@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:24 -0700 (PDT) From: William Mills To: Mike Jones , Torsten Lodderstedt In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777BBC@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-551393103-349442844-1344974064=:6561" Cc: O Auth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: William Mills List-Id: OAUTH WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:54:31 -0000 ---551393103-349442844-1344974064=:6561 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, I still need 1.0a to work which I was hoping to replace with MAC.=0A= =0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Mike Jones =0ATo: William Mills ; Torsten Lodders= tedt =0ACc: O Auth WG =0ASent: T= uesday, August 14, 2012 12:44 PM=0ASubject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a=0A = =0A=0A =0AAgreed.=C2=A0 Use Bearer now.=C2=A0 If you have requirements that= Bearer *can=E2=80=99t* meet, please use them as input to the working group= =E2=80=99s future work.=0A=C2=A0=0A=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 -- Mike=0A=C2=A0=0AFrom:Torsten Lod= derstedt [mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net] =0ASent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012= 12:43 PM=0ATo: William Mills=0ACc: Mike Jones; O Auth WG=0ASubject: Re: [O= AUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a=0A=C2=A0=0AHi Bill,=0A=0Ado you need to specify this as= pect of your SASL profile now? Why don't you wait for the group to complete= the work on signing/HoK? =0A=0AYou could also contribute your use cases to= drive the discussion.=0A=0Abest regards,=0ATorsten.=0AAm 14.08.2012 21:37,= schrieb William Mills:=0AIt's for the OAUTH SASL spec. =C2=A0I've been wri= ting it with the idea that OAuth 1.0a would work (since I think we'll have = extant 1.0a typ[e tokens we want to allow for IMAP), but several folks were= saying when this all started that 1.0a was dead and I should not refer to = it.=0A>=C2=A0=0A>I want to make sure the SASL mechanism is build to properl= y handle signed auth schemes and not just bearer (cookie) type. =C2=A0=0A>= =C2=A0=0A>-bill=0A>=C2=A0=0A>=0A>________________________________=0A> =0A>F= rom:Mike Jones =0A>To: William Mills ; O Auth WG =0A>Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2= 012 12:28 PM=0A>Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a=0A>=C2=A0=0A>What proble= m are you trying to solve?=0A>=C2=A0=0A>From:oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto= :oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of William Mills=0A>Sent: Tuesday, Augus= t 14, 2012 12:22 PM=0A>To: O Auth WG=0A>Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a=0A>= =C2=A0=0A>What's the general opinion on 1.0a? =C2=A0Am I stepping in someth= ing if I refer to it in another draft? =C2=A0I want to reference an auth sc= heme that uses signing and now MAC is apparently going back to the drawing = board, so I'm thinking about using 1.0a.=0A>=C2=A0=0A>Thanks,=0A>=C2=A0=0A>= -bill=0A>=C2=A0=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>________________________________________= _______=0A>OAuth mailing list=0A>OAuth@ietf.org=0A>https://www.ietf.org/mai= lman/listinfo/oauth ---551393103-349442844-1344974064=:6561 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah, I st= ill need 1.0a to work which I was hoping to replace with MAC.
<= div>
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: William Mills <wmills= _92105@yahoo.com>; Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> <= br>Cc: O Auth WG <oauth= @ietf.org>
Sent: T= uesday, August 14, 2012 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a
=0A
=0A=0A =0A =0A