Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF #89 OAuth Meeting Notes

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3FA1A020D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:23:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IrjVcLIe86q for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227931A01FE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob111.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUxhMrG5vjuixc1TKSJtaZFdE1lcON4a0@postini.com; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:23:40 PST
Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h18so15915752igc.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:23:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=6V2ejZiJgjWPkInfRXSdapYcAs8ky2TvABwSUwKQWlo=; b=VF/AOAaNE6XtKUZQR1Jed/om95XMgVd0LaJ/Tj++vQ0HpEDu64MB+nnAMjkFqKDClg MMO+El8obuwRrykm8tAbKJ39pzo7jW2aaX9lreqtAS5EZfBx+02ZLGgNGtJAkK8frRAp Um7psWfYazCTyLz13F7A7F/HouO83gppQz97rf6vcRuuXF8sS1Vv9juscLpb2hTdf5zV sqsLM7GEMskdzE0NVCUk1xFky+6f/UJh01mM0wk2eS7uWvNiVa5S7lCTNj+AOm3Vrx6I +Xclwyii/pW0MBirobvYmRSQot/sJlMxnjziu8cQ7CDIHkovjp2winAXdfJXICgqy5Ds VIGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmR471qD6m9DCpgylA/B0nsjfXmQYTbzKL1qJr1RM0yXzykyTGaeMtyRkoA71mgHcw2h/teeHwpYduv1IR3O/nVVzwmJzKX7RwIGvIGunI2EqUUlCD5/pO0vmRh1ROP/8tZUXGlHkwv7TQ5H7gpDWTMWPosSA==
X-Received: by 10.42.67.130 with SMTP id t2mr9418235ici.17.1394101417042; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:23:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.67.130 with SMTP id t2mr9418227ici.17.1394101416865; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:23:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.240.201 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:23:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <19fab520a70b4065b587a32a31f69470@BLUPR03MB309.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <531729EB.8050802@gmx.net> <346018d1df7534a815c267bfcc920cd8@lodderstedt.net> <19fab520a70b4065b587a32a31f69470@BLUPR03MB309.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:23:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQJj4psse0=hdG60VM=DexnME4kERV8V7fkfJ1sxzac0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334bfdbc0de404f3ed870a
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/iIqnWHUeF2EcPqys2NBcMHDCk9Y
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF #89 OAuth Meeting Notes
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:23:46 -0000

While I'm sure we can and will discuss the organization of the documents
for some
time, I wanted to reiterate that I believe the client credential management
part of this needs to be reevaluated (not just reorganized).


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>wrote;wrote:

> I'm not convinced that scope should be in core
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> torsten@lodderstedt.net
> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:38 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF #89 OAuth Meeting Notes
>
> Hi,
>
> regarding dynamic client registration: it has been suggested to merge core
> and meta data, or at least move some elements (such as scopes) to the core
> spec. Would you please add this?
>
> regards,
> Torsten.
>
> Am 05.03.2014 13:43, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
> > Hi al
> >
> > here are the notes from the OAuth f2f meeting this week:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-oauth
> >
> > They are rather short! If someone took some more detailed notes please
> > send us a mail.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes & Derek
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>