Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 and clients without browsers

Yes, thank you.  I'm glad there's already a spec for this.
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>wrote:

> I think you are describing the device profile:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Marius
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Trying a different DL...
> > --
> > Andrew Arnott
> > "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
> death
> > your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The recent OAuth 2 specs seem to omit the scenario of a client that
> cannot
> >> host or invoke a browser but could display a URL to the user and ask the
> >> user to enter a PIN.  Was this an intentional omission?  If I am
> correct,
> >> this forces those clients to continue to use OAuth 1.0, which is not
> only
> >> less desirable but it will limit which services they can access.
> >> Thoughts?
> >> --
> >> Andrew Arnott
> >> "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
> death
> >> your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >
> >
>