Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Mike Jones <[e-mail]>]

I believe that the changes in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-09 address the DISCUSS and comments.  Please review - ideally before the upcoming telechat.

                                                       Thanks again,
                                                       -- Mike

From: Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:03 PM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>; Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

The attached drafts address the DISCUSSes from Adam and Alexey in the ways proposed.  A summary of the changes from -08 is:
*        Revised the transformation between the issuer identifier and the authorization server metadata location to conform to BCP 190, as suggested by Adam Roach.
*        Defined the characters allowed in registered metadata names and values, as suggested by Alexey Melnikov.
*        Changed to using the RFC 8174 boilerplate instead of the RFC 2119 boilerplate, as suggested by Ben Campbell.
*        Acknowledged additional reviewers.
I've attached both source and .txt versions to facilitate comparison to -08.  Unless I hear additional suggestions for improvements by my end of business Tuesday, I'll plan to publish this as -09.

                                                       Thanks all,
                                                       -- Mike

From: Mike Jones
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2018 7:23 AM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Your understanding matches with the intent of the language from RFC 7638. I'll plan to proceed on that basis then.
Thanks again,
-- Mike
From: Alexey Melnikov
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: Mike Jones, The IESG
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Hi Mike, On Wed, Jan 24, 2018, at 10:11 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > Thanks for the useful review, Alexey. I propose that we use the same > character restrictions that are described in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7638#section-6, which are: > > (a) require that member names being registered use > only printable ASCII characters excluding double quote ('"') and > backslash ('\') (the Unicode characters with code points U+0021, > U+0023 through U+005B, and U+005D through U+007E), This looks reasonable. > or > > (b) if new members are defined that use other code > points, require that their definitions specify the exact Unicode code > point sequences used to represent them. Furthermore, proposed > registrations that use Unicode code points that can only be > represented in JSON strings as escaped characters must not be > accepted. So just to double check: it is Ok to register names in Greek or Cyrillic (for example) and they will be compared in a case sensitive manner? > I also propose that we say that member name comparison occurs in the > manner described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159#section-8.3. My understanding is that RFC 7159 recommends case-sensitive comparison and that is fine with me. > Will that work for you, Alexey? Best Regards, Alexey > > Thanks, > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[e-mail]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:06 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; Hannes Tschofenig > ; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; > [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> > Subject: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the well written IANA Considerations section. I have one > comment on it which should be easy to resolve: > > The document doesn't seem to say anything about allowed characters in > Metadata names. When the document talks about "case-insensitive > matching", it is not clear how to implement the matching, because it is > not clear whether or not Metadata names are ASCII only. If they are not, > then you need to better define what "case insensitive" means. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I am agreeing with Adam's DISCUSS. > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth