Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comments

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Thu, 18 August 2011 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A276F21F8BB0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TH-tJIHNT8Pv for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C4921F8BAE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [87.142.251.101] (helo=[192.168.71.35]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1Qu3uU-0005LD-Jl; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:49:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4E4D267F.2020507@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:49:35 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
References: <1313096811.22073.96.camel@ground> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345029DFA82D@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <63366D5A116E514AA4A9872D3C533539570852FDA5@QEO40072.de.t-online.corp> <1313677744.13419.119.camel@ground>
In-Reply-To: <1313677744.13419.119.camel@ground>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Sender: torsten@lodderstedt-online.de
Cc: "Anganes, Amanda L" <aanganes@mitre.org>, "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comments
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:48:39 -0000

> I can see the logic of putting both token types first (though I still
> prefer the auth grant first), but having the auth grant in between the
> two token types is definitely a bad idea.

+1

>
>   -- Justin
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth