Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR) vs OIDC request object

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 16 January 2020 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66936120855 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:20:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8023aE9iuTWn for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E226D12002F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00G4KYFX012590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:20:37 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:20:34 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200116042034.GE80030@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAANoGhK0-n6V_RogvVZ=8J8AQCEUUVJQn4_7wSWYixeQM8aZsw@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR00MB0843D5044E11E0F4CE5F5D09F53B0@CH2PR00MB0843.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAANoGhJB4mYSFiWKt3T=cObH7uCW0s3Zpv2m92+YaAY2Oy4mqw@mail.gmail.com> <2aca5c38-bb20-497e-14ed-f4a9245a9439@connect2id.com> <7baae999-47c1-f749-6c51-f45022ab1a3d@ve7jtb.com> <3d9ffc74-6c9c-48a1-0c98-65a7465e8dbc@connect2id.com> <CAHdPCmNHeUyDjrc32oQPZ5g3oars-XY3vq2p3qt2LzzkZMTw5w@mail.gmail.com> <89345e9b-8191-f01d-71a6-453ec197796f@connect2id.com> <CH2PR00MB0679453419D7494476B21DFDF5370@CH2PR00MB0679.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <20200116041252.GD80030@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200116041252.GD80030@kduck.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/lXIJXbNIQkPRuaHiDtmMcEGgac4>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR) vs OIDC request object
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 04:20:41 -0000

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 08:12:52PM -0800, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> I'm only the irresponsible AD here, but I expect that you would be welcome
> (nay, encouraged!) to write up a clear explanation of why the current
> (post-IESG) formulation is bad, what a better formulation should be, and
> why.  This would presumably also include some justification for how the
> better formulation remains secure (which can be somewhat challenging when
> combining data sources that have differing levels of provenance).  The
> strongest voice that drove the change at IESG evaluation (Ben C) is no longer
> on the IESG, though IIRC the arguments resonated pretty well with me.

[looks like I'm misremembering the bit about Ben C, at least as far as
shows up at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/history/]