Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

  Hannes,

what about discovery?

"Recommendations of commonly used Scope values" sounds to weak from my 
point of view. I would rather suggest to work towards a clear definition 
of scope syntax and semantics, including resource server identification.

Please note, I submitted a I-D on token revocation 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation/) I 
would like to become a WG item.

regards,
Torsten.

Am 12.09.2010 02:15, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
> I forgot an item already, namely 'identity management using OAuth' in 
> the style of OpenID Connect.
>
> At IIW we also had a chat about an implementers guide and 
> interoperability tests. The idea of the implementers guide is create a 
> living document that captures implementation experience with different 
> programming languages and development frameworks. It was also expected 
> that implementers will bundle different profiles and different 
> extensions in their implementation and it would be useful to describe 
> their experience.
>
> In any case, I think both items are important.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On 11.09.2010 19:59, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
>> about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
>> discuss WG re-chartering.
>>
>> The following items had been proposed at the meeting:
>>
>> * Messaging Signing
>> Example: 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html
>>
>> * User Experience Extensions
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/
>>
>> * Artifact Binding
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/
>>
>> * SAML for OAuth
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/
>>
>> * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
>> No draft available (to my knowledge)
>>
>> * Dynamic Client Registration
>> Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
>>
>> I am interested to hear
>> a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
>> same time.
>> b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
>> commitment)
>> c) what items are you willing to review
>> d) whether we should consider other items?
>>
>> Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
>> Please use the Web tool to upload it:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
>> Also use the following filename convention:
>> draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth