Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR): signing
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 15 January 2020 20:32 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBCC120975 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:32:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZeNYCV20aHZ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE54B120979 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00FKWkop012688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:32:48 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:32:45 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: George Aristy <george.aristy@gmail.com>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200115203245.GO30105@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAHhMjFUKoJaLFnYtPjDGKVyw43Z_YRDTL+ZLk_Ax8DHdhKMzBA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHhMjFUKoJaLFnYtPjDGKVyw43Z_YRDTL+ZLk_Ax8DHdhKMzBA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/mK1H0pdzW6bNAZcgXce--FUcDlA>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR): signing
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:32:56 -0000
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:29:39PM -0500, George Aristy wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Is it possible to relax the requirement to sign the claims set if an > authenticated encryption mode with prior shared secrets is used? Eg. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-madden-jose-ecdh-1pu-02. This would > reduce the size of the request object substantially. It seems fairly late in the publication process to make such a change, since the properties provided by digital signature and AEAD tag are subtly different, and the key-management lifecycle needed to provide secure operation is different. That said, off the top of my head, I don't know of anything that would prevent this functionality from being specified as an extension to plain JAR. -Ben
- [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR… George Aristy
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request … Benjamin Kaduk