Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel

Mark Mcgloin <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8953D21F87AE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z1O43suvzA04 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C9021F87A2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <oauth@ietf.org> from <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:06:36 +0100
Received: from d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.39.225) by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.148) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:06:33 +0100
Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.251]) by d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q3P96WHF1319020; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:06:32 +0100
Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q3P93Zpe006350; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:03:36 -0400
Received: from d06ml091.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06ml091.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.104.170]) by d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q3P93Z9H006347; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:03:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FFC677@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <CALaySJLy6jpuPqxQXfKfpx0TpcK1gav1NtcTOoh+NOr11JSCbw@mail.gmail.com> <4F8DE789.4030704@mtcc.com> <CALaySJK1ej_HkP5Jz26XT-KjULirD2iFfVOpRkHgPZp-CbJCrg@mail.gmail.com> <4F957EA7.3060004@mtcc.com> <OF3ECF645E.478720A4-ON802579EA.002D0B13-802579EA.002D8D07@ie.ibm.com> <4F96A99F.7010303@mtcc.com> <85556C53-99DD-47A2-A0D5-2F86DD2B668F@oracle.com> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FFC41C@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <4F96DA70.4020108@stpeter.im> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FFC677@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
X-KeepSent: C25E2154:A28FCD53-802579EB:0031C48A; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP5 SHF29 November 12, 2010
Message-ID: <OFC25E2154.A28FCD53-ON802579EB.0031C48A-802579EB.003209B5@ie.ibm.com>
From: Mark Mcgloin <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:06:25 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML091/06/M/IBM(Release 8.5.2FP1 ZX852FP1HF12|September 28, 2011) at 25/04/2012 10:06:26
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
x-cbid: 12042509-6892-0000-0000-000001A8AD72
Cc: "oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>, oauth-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:06:42 -0000

This topic should not have been raised again with this mailing list as we
did reach a consensus before. What happened was that Barry sent a targeted
email to some people, including Michael Thomas, regarding some additional
wording as part of his shepard review. Michael inadvertently replied to
this email list

If everyone could avoid replying to this thread, we can resolve our
differences with the smaller mail group


thanks
Mark

oauth-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 24/04/2012 19:05:55:

> From:
>
> Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
>
> To:
>
> Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
>
> Cc:
>
> "oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org>rg>,
> "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
>
> Date:
>
> 24/04/2012 19:06
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel
>
> Sent by:
>
> oauth-bounces@ietf.org
>
> Berry did make a consensus call when this was originally raised.
>
> EH
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:53 AM
> > To: Eran Hammer
> > Cc: oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-
> > threatmodel
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> > > We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because one
> > > person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise unanimous
> > > consensus from the group.
> >
> > Hi Eran,
> >
> > Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we
> don't vote. So
> > consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter of
> addressing valid
> > technical issues that people raise. I shall re-read this thread and
related
> > earlier threads to see if the issues raised by Michael Thomas have been
> > answered, but if there are open issues then we need to address them.
Now,
> > it might be that he hasn't accepted the answers provided, in which case
he
> > might be "in the rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not
> necessarily a simple
> > matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on.
> > However, I think you know that anyway. :)
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > - --
> > Peter Saint-Andre
> > https://stpeter.im/
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >
> > iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF
> > +Zu
> > F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l
> > =5WMm
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>