Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for agenda items

I'd like to coordinate a side meeting with Nat, Brian, myself and other
interested parties in Montreal to discuss Distributed OAuth.

If we have two meetings, I'd like a timeslot in the second to summarize the
side meeting and discuss next steps (if any).

Separately, I'd like a time slot for an update on Reciprocal OAuth.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:52 PM, n-sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> wrote:

> No, not really. I was thinking of more informal thing. The session is
> supposed to be Wednesday afternoon, so I was thinking that it might be a
> good idea to do a bit of recap among contributors to draw up a battle plan
> towards IETF 102.
>
>
>
> Nat
>
>
>
> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef [mailto:rifaat.ietf@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2018 9:22 PM
> *To:* n-sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
> *Cc:* Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>; oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for agenda items
>
>
>
> Nat,
>
>
>
> Are you asking for an interim meeting?
>
> We could schedule the Distributed OAuth discussion for the Wednesday
> meeting; that will give you guys sometime to discuss these face-to-face in
> London.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>  Rifaat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:00 AM, n-sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Then let us do it. We need to put all the proposals on the table and
> strategize the design.
>
> Perhaps we need a side meeting as well.
>
>
>
> nat
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Brian
> Campbell
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2018 1:31 AM
> *To:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for agenda items
>
>
>
> I hadn't previously been planning on it but am happy to do so.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Nat,
>
>
>
> During the interim meeting, 3 drafts mentioned in the context of *Distributed
> OAuth*:
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-meta-08
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-02
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-oauth-audience-00
>
>
>
>
>
> *Brian, Hannes,*
>
>
>
> Are you planning on presenting your documents?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>  Rifaat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would be interested in hearing that.
>
>
>
> Also, as part of "Distributed OAuth", can we do a bit of re-cap on some of
> the previous drafts on the similar topic as we discussed in the interim?
> i.e., Brian's draft (where is the link now?) and my draft (
> draft-sakimura-oauth-meta
> <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sakimura-oauth-meta-08.txt>)?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Nat
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:30 AM William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hannes & Rifaat,
>
>
> I would like the opportunity to present on OAuth 2.0 Incremental
> Authorization (draft-wdenniss-oauth-incremental-auth) [an update for
> which will be posted today] and "OAuth 2.0 Device Posture Signals"
> (draft-wdenniss-oauth-device-posture).
>
>
>
> I can also give an update on the status of Device Flow
> (draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow). I expect that to be short now that WGLC
> has concluded and the document has advanced.
>
>
>
> Little late to this thread and I see we already have 2 sessions in the
> draft agenda, but I'd like to add my support to keeping both sessions,
> there's always a lot to discuss and in the past we've been able to use any
> spare time to discuss the security topics of the day.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> William
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:40 AM Hannes Tschofenig <
> Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> It is time already to think about the agenda for the next IETF meeting.
> Rifaat and I were wondering whether we need one or two sessions. We would
> like to make the decision based on the topics we will discuss. Below you
> can find a first version of the agenda with a few remarks. Let us know if
> you have comments or suggestions for additional agenda items.
>
>
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Rifaat
>
>
>
> OAuth Agenda
>
> ------------
>
>
>
> - Welcome and Status Update  (Chairs)
>
>
>
>   * OAuth Security Workshop Report
>
>
>
>   * Documents in IESG processing
>
>      # draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-07
>
>      # draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08
>
>      # draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-15
>
>      # draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-11
>
>
>
>        Remark: Status updates only if needed.
>
>
>
> -  JSON Web Token Best Current Practices
>
>    # draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-00
>
>
>
>    Remark: We are lacking reviews on this document.
>
>    Most likely we will not get them during the f2f meeting
>
>    but rather by reaching out to individuals ahead of time.
>
>
>
> -  OAuth 2.0 Mutual TLS Client Authentication and Certificate Bound Access
> Tokens
>
>    # draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-06
>
>
>
>    Remark: Could be completed by the time of the IETF meeting.
>
>
>
> - OAuth Security Topics
>
>   # draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-04
>
>
>
>   Remark: We could do a consensus call on parts of the document soon.
>
>
>
> - OAuth 2.0 Token Binding
>
>   # draft-ietf-oauth-token-binding-05
>
>
>
>   Remark: Document is moving along but we are lacking implementations.
>
>
>
> - OAuth 2.0 Device Posture Signals
>
>   # draft-wdenniss-oauth-device-posture-01
>
>
>
>   Remark: Interest in the work but we are lacking content (maybe even
>
>   expertise in the group)
>
>
>
> - Reciprocal OAuth
>
>   # draft-hardt-oauth-mutual-02
>
>
>
>   Remark: We had a virtual interim meeting on this topic and there is
>
>   interest in this work and apparently no competing solutions. The plan
>
>   is to run a call for adoption once we are allowed to add a new milestone
>
>   to our charter.
>
>
>
> - Distributed OAuth
>
>   # draft-hardt-oauth-distributed-00
>
>
>
>   Remark: We had a virtual interim meeting on this topic and there is
>
>   interest in this work. Further work on the scope is needed.
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> --
>
> Nat Sakimura
>
> Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from
> your computer. Thank you.*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>