[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC6749 (3880)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 08 December 2015 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F881B2F24; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:29:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AmlCLoUw-Whn; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655DE1B2F1C; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0BDEB1804F5; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:27:54 -0800 (PST)
To: eriksencosta@gmail.com, dick.hardt@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151208152754.0BDEB1804F5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:27:54 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/nGnNZf3954M65RdW6v7JqXW3blY>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Kathleen.Moriarty@emc.com, iesg@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC6749 (3880)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:29:59 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3880 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Eriksen Costa <eriksencosta@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2014-02-04 Rejected by: Kathleen Moriarty (IESG) Section: 10.16 Original Text ------------- For public clients using implicit flows, this specification does not provide any method for the client to determine what client an access token was issued to. Corrected Text -------------- For public clients using implicit flows, this specification does not provide any method for the authorization server to determine what client an access token was issued to. Notes ----- A client can only know about tokens issued to it and not for other clients. >From the WG: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12391.html --VERIFIER NOTES-- The current text is correct, see https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12391.html -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Prateek Mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Bill Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… John Bradley
- [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascript u… philip.kershaw
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… Manfred Steyer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… philip.kershaw
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… Prateek Mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… Prateek Mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… philip.kershaw
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… philip.kershaw
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suitable grant type for a Javascri… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC674… Eriksen Costa
- [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC6749 (3880) RFC Errata System