[OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 01 November 2013 19:26 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9CB11E813D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0rjM19eux2xW for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFDD21E80E8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from masham-mac.home ([81.164.176.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEoGY-1VRwME02Pa-00G215 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:26:48 +0100
Message-ID: <52740076.7050609@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:26:46 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1ZM7Snw85KXIsl67jPWjFX9+u1ikoSQ8XFPUw1n4B8MkFlCoVzm XaHIe3ASS15uzHV2pwxgCppArwYalbfvFzQgRoabJJ7XETui1tI3kT2f4/t2cG3YU3p+XZJ bvjaaYsi8RMHJLMHc1YhRryfzhlZYh8AxtyBq/AAbWfMnaJnDrVmROQgwUJDlqRgnBxfDmU Xezcw2XzBPMYbDmBm9Bbg==
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:26:56 -0000
Hi Mike, Hi all, I was just trying to find out whether version -12 of the JWT spec addresses prior comments and the diff version of the document does not really give that indication. To me it seems that version -12 of the document was published to update -11 in an attempt to create an alignment with the JOSE work. I believe it would be useful to respond to the review comments so that we can be sure that those had been taken into account (or that they had been rejected for a good reason). Here are the comments I have found: * Review by James Manger: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg11905.html * Review by Mishra Prateek: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12003.html * My own shepherd review: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12125.html Ciao Hannes
- [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12 Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12 Mike Jones