Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on OAuth 2.0 Discovery

Phil,

Right. So what my conditional approvals (11 conditions in total) said was
to drop the word "discovery" from everywhere. This is not a discovery spec.
This is a configuration lookup spec as you correctly points out. So, I am
with you here.

Also, my 2nd conditiion is essentially saying to drop section 3.

One thing that I overlooked and am with you is that we need to be able to
express the AS-RS relationships. I have been preaching this in the other
thread for so many times as you know so I thought I pointed it out, but
missed apparently in my previous comment. So, I would add my 12th
condition:

12. A way to express a list of valid RSs for this AS needs to be added to
section 2.

Best,

Nat

2016-03-11 2:09 GMT+09:00 Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt@oracle.com>:

> I strongly oppose. 2 major issues.
>
> This is not service discovery this is configuration lookup. The client
> must have already discovered the oauth issuer uri and the resource uri.
>
> The objective was to provide a method to ensure the client has a valid set
> of endpoints to prevent mitm of endpoints like the token endpoint to the
> resource server.
>
> The draft does not address the issue of a client being given a bad
> endpoint for an rs. What we end up with is a promiscuous authz service
> giving out tokens to an unwitting client.
>
> Phil
>
> On Mar 10, 2016, at 08:06, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 to move forward with these
>
> On 10/03/16 17:35, Brian Campbell wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Roland Hedberg <roland.hedberg@umu.se> <roland.hedberg@umu.se>
> wrote:
>
>
> I support this document being moved forward with these two changes:
>
> - change name to “OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Discovery Metadata” as
> proposed by Brian and
> - use the URI path suffix ’oauth-authorization-server’ instead of
> ’openid-configuration’ as proposed by Justin.
>
>
> 18 feb 2016 kl. 14:40 skrev Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net
> :
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a Last Call for comments on the  OAuth 2.0 Discovery
>
> specification:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-01
>
> Since this document was only adopted recently we are running this last
> call for **3 weeks**.
>
> Please have your comments in no later than March 10th.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> — Roland
>
> ”Everybody should be quiet near a little stream and listen."
> From ’Open House for Butterflies’ by Ruth Krauss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en