Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 21 June 2012 18:44 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558A211E808D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAG-Ju5xdU9u for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C1DA11E808A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2012 18:44:43 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.101]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2012 20:44:43 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+E0AM4dhCEMLlDQ5ixC1sXwwJbQUXMAHGZgfGG0Z G9WxJtYapvt7Km
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBZYvPM94bByJw1Ci0KZhhSNqzaRKp-duKPe+tz_LwKBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:44:40 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5001A039-3459-45C3-B295-FAC0957CDE00@gmx.net>
References: <4FE1C16D.6010602@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+k3eCS4iNpRfQ+by8L+petrT8jJVhjUeQTLxXcgZ+aHkKu4Cw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE1FD1E.1060601@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+k3eCR2gh2=rkT4UiZQNswphg6+19Rn8uQxErpcJJKwsWjchg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBZYvPM94bByJw1Ci0KZhhSNqzaRKp-duKPe+tz_LwKBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:44:46 -0000
Hi Barry, let me describe what we are trying to do here: 1.) This document creates a new URN with urn:ietf:params:oauth. There are procedures for creating new entries under urn:ietf:params, as described in RFC 3553, and we have them in the document. 2.) We provide guidance on how others then define new sub-registries under urn:ietf:params:oauth. Class refers to concepts like 'grant-type'. This document does not create these sub-registries. Instead, it only provides guidance for doing that and leaves it to other documents, such as to the bearer document. [Note: We should have created these child registries in the document ourselves as well.] Ciao Hannes On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > I'd like to see the new version, since there appear to be a bunch of > changes, but first here are some issues that I don't think have been > brought up yet: > > The URN registration stuff seems very incompletely baked. The title > of 5.1 correctly says it's registering a sub-namespace, but the text > incorrectly says that it's creating a registry. Perhaps IANA will > understand, but I think you need to do this in two parts. The first > part would register the "oauth" sub-namespace, and the second would > create a new registry for the things that go into it. > > Now, as to what goes into it: What is "class"? Is there meant to be a > registry of classes? Is that what section 5.1 is trying to create > (which should be done in a new section 5.2)? What initial values are > registered there? > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-… Brian Campbell