IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SPOP: Code Challenge Discussion

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 03 December 2014 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCAE1A1AAA for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:22:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qxFhz_ztfpW for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55A11A0174 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.131.134] ([80.92.119.109]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTwYX-1XVZhC0iZt-00QjsE; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:22:51 +0100
Message-ID: <547F009A.70408@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:22:50 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
References: <547EF145.5030501@gmx.net> <B0DA0AD6-DE2C-4ECB-B2E2-04F369AAD610@ve7jtb.com> <547EF82A.1050505@gmx.net> <BA1B0D79-E77B-4A46-8147-9FCBEBCFA8A4@ve7jtb.com> <547EFD97.2040708@gmx.net> <5E44E18E-8BE2-4CE3-AD07-543D9A7619DE@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <5E44E18E-8BE2-4CE3-AD07-543D9A7619DE@ve7jtb.com>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GI6X8JmnIQgcK1i3XRsM3t4hLgLbkF0vo"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+vuKCL5ys9goi1murAFi5LOj4iAHdvfj78Ts9/KPXL3wsh+BaBn Ubr8f/HjX8Z4WhVZukUKlam6icCiTP7A1epezzTvOTtUqfnjYBPqWTWBoOC793f92lA9A6I uDfFrnJt7GOIfvbXRHPgESh5f+MZ5zNAnwOT+gZHiKO2QCAywO+F6EyryfwwSbhVL+UXhon 0ACoqlRF15+VLQ750A8dQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/oAsq6xxNx8PVRwyECrmsmG7m5gE
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] SPOP: Code Challenge Discussion
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:22:55 -0000

On 12/03/2014 01:14 PM, John Bradley wrote:
> The only question is if the OAuth ext review list is the correct place for review.  

I think it is.

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email