[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.1 - drop implicit flow?

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D5120815 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:32:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SyHvJyOd3TIF for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07348120813 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h23so24545882ljc.8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gPilq39T6nOhfGWoMrbL01DTSt1aJgtEfP+h1zGHKLo=; b=fOAgggWh7XrNymofI9x4CDIFB7AAZ3qqMdNLalC+bgCzrxek0Q1w2fkgh+s8vewFb2 NbnE8bxvNZEkkmQs2RkwReNf82+L94/wp3zSYwqCmK5WutRBAl8Vt785hTR6uskG8T9d HPGSqoV9NY56BXHZEucgLHtd+gSCKJZp6FMDkldapf+UkN0C6ovU5VitaJiGwMq22sls uSty1Y5NWEG6q60EDwLE3yKZnPR3aduJiMsOHicK5Wdv4ABryIlklDIGFtihcRw2eEv6 WfgydG774NX9zX66hLftNJ6gPbc4GIsCP90nlR6a04uTh3ZvmjGaZe0eSu5/BEq0sJEc Srgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gPilq39T6nOhfGWoMrbL01DTSt1aJgtEfP+h1zGHKLo=; b=m/5OrsKI8KHF00eOh6w7wnMn/udUIh7nnKfORCD6XfQFkzyy1ALrQKgVsWbhRpv5U8 D2A+jb/LsZu9R1JPEA9BHIr22Z8JH3QfYlJ6yuSCEhwn2TDZuGt3fttJFKBGAqwwliwl +H3FSmqOyIWYbVR29bL3Gsg2VZCFGj4V3k8Kzs3VQfuf0mg67BvcCdFNTznqrX1v+o/M GyjODQnABI7K9VBzYhZk044V5ti1ojnmtYSIIY7xORnROvW2o2Gds2xy/lsRfJZiCTK5 ySN9PduEE5GvaJD3NLAvkBFw7rb7PEMb1MQpb6H6QvHq3ht0t/ayexFTtEvvWHSvKNN/ Gq4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWH8jkpCpByCIdtzDoQ2VBEeDs/BgxfB1NTQ8/VrstsBlQJIWo4 j0+iQYz0vLGn56axpp5hVW0JHokI8fT4x8Ojcn4Ahx/I4+U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJ01QMptGPMSsiAIknUPPRnb6YkALR49DbEVQTxWVK9p+Tm1L/jh6Zw4wEs1fszVNqZ54zwfXYdjEDh6DUAY4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:580c:: with SMTP id m12mr13988988ljb.150.1582057936760; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:32:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:31:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-u+egKriB1nvm9CtvFgp4cY1j6sNykGVuTTpsyvR5hA2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055b8a5059edf9184"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/oJsqhmSGFuypauvV1mkijat5HV8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.1 - drop implicit flow?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:32:21 -0000

Hey List

(I'm using the OAuth 2.1 name as a placeholder for the doc that Aaron,
Torsten, and I are working on)

Given the points Aaron brought up in

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/hXEfLXgEqrUQVi7Qy8X_279DCNU


Does anyone have concerns with dropping the implicit flow from the OAuth
2.1 document so that developers don't use it?

/Dick