Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C411299F6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:51:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1X_aUNIn5ab for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F0A129482 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:51:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 21928 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2017 11:45:07 +0100
Received: from nb-10510.ethz.ch (HELO ?82.130.103.143?) (82.130.103.143) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 16 Feb 2017 11:45:06 +0100
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
References: <148724107880.15846.17288887741708916676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F3EC0B7D-7E2C-45F6-9EB2-B70FAD9623F5@fastmail.fm>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=c3=bchlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <6e35b9f8-dd41-0da0-7ee5-210566110ae8@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:45:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F3EC0B7D-7E2C-45F6-9EB2-B70FAD9623F5@fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/oOp0X2SgdsAfdv0aDgvVrmFxquA>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_dra?= =?utf-8?q?ft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:51:51 -0000

Hi Alexey,

sorry my fault, I read redirect_uri instead of request_uri and was confused...

Mirja


On 16.02.2017 11:48, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
>
>> On 16 Feb 2017, at 10:31, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>; wrote:
>
>  (Snip)
>> - Should this be like this?
>> OLD
>> ""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be included in Request
>> Objects."
>> NEW
>> ""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be both included in
>> Request Objects."
>
> You can't have either. Your new text implies that including one of them is Ok, which is incorrect.
>
>