[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 October 2024 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietf.org
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.8.155] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864BEC151089; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 04:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172795621321.1107043.9847416581461080832@dt-datatracker-7bbd96684-zjf54>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 04:50:13 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: ARNOKYEB2W6TGWV7WTHO2PPKN3Z3QK5I
X-Message-ID-Hash: ARNOKYEB2W6TGWV7WTHO2PPKN3Z3QK5I
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-oauth.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Reply-To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/onJxswHgFDNtvbo5uKrbVvw4SKI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:oauth-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:oauth-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:oauth-leave@ietf.org>

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for this document.

Many thanks to Mike Bishop for the HTTPDIR review.

One more IANA point. Section 8 states:

> Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days
can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the iesg@ietf.org mailing list)
for resolution.

Maybe it is me not being a native speaker, but it is not clear to me what is
requested of the IESG. If the goal is to add a "IESG Approval" (see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126#section-4.10 ), then it should be stated
clearly, and by the way I do not think that is a good idea. If it is
escalation, then IANA already has procedures in place for that, and I don't
think this text adds anything to that. Can you expand?