[OAUTH-WG] Encoding claims in the OAuth 2 state parameter using a JWT and Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2: Call for Adoption Finalized

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 04 February 2016 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4463C1ACE0D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBaYjXrIUWPt for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1BBE1ACDD2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([80.92.118.18]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUpI8-1aZAM603MS-00YD53 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:26:46 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <56B3A5F4.8010401@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:26:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GwFSred4O4rietaJ2KAQJTC6Ag5J42lFF"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pejtTdhMg2iiKWArt/AXfLp40YhGLY8KNSFA7w1Dq/Mi52NVMyj 0hCRJX3M25qS8z5t8P4n4WWecTsmMZAZgPvG875HNp3H2nkny+0Pux41u0BSNHz01EjbE54 mG47NYXUi4M55NFhZziIJUrWC2isKAEniz2xp0BbWJp0wNSQLc9oHQY6eEvxBYNEyNlpWoL jaui8iNDEZerxx2HjNksg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:a31thebigZ8=:5NvEsk15sL/sUgJzgDG6wX ecOnXrS4vGNe2T7axq9LFxYAlC63DMGqd/TohxLWeoMZ7sF8KmXTvpXbV/UacXgO1UDQm6kut cQSdj8LWL2qEYf85ocJRvKqOPCCEdNflSuAn0OZTB21t7czjPgvbA2Nm45LKFWqEg3c2mHez3 reAQBZIJg37SC3jSm5NJPJ/72AR8xs/HTwvkfjLYEQgE7BDBvWG+pj330QExp7UFA8uc9eWJi mivoA+Kebg8BcUMbEpZNoHo11EJzNRQXT8Ba4QzbWxHLPpqXbhEyXaVMl2Ui5ilp+udn999cU 2sf2243jadFfkKxuP8kbL5VMmvzmFJCboeztBgq7l49i2/uChfXdUALfMwGSOhRty6Z8sckMg Kjc3uWCqXezhVd0wD3uzYd+bzhLdnVloDv/0wEXFoAYWN7RGLJi/rT1QCxGzIl53DrqfE6LMa 2DpSM3yM2ZVIDIuQVVODdGHjvLIdGM8nMSH0L7dI6XKn6DHRc+Y+fgrVQZKvMdqiXdyxtVl+E SPqM6XhlADsXInifMNJpuq3t2k3JuQXAfMyMkwi6Hv75tL1CphnEcHJiXM95O9Jtp66QkRF/N 8GN8dPXfmc9BBH+hDUQuELnhqrp5svtrZCb9c3f9mpj5cWNoGKT56PE8b5usEX1UKu7O6hoJI BEyo5rdiU/VNfJ+/rkfb/LCQhPLy+JtLRoR2hlDVxTp0wItjT3ceMci3Ju+4cc7D01wGa3UiD 7Jf2lc5z29PELbdRXSPraF6vbmmt6MwRjU0TVRCf63Oryquo1iE35CaOk2g=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/pIZ3XzsWOGboUMZhz6k1WI4gQx4>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding claims in the OAuth 2 state parameter using a JWT and Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2: Call for Adoption Finalized
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:26:50 -0000

Hi all,

On January 19th I posted a call for adoption of the 'Encoding claims in
the OAuth 2 state parameter using a JWT' and of the 'Stateless Client
Identifier for OAuth 2' specifications, see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15406.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15407.html

Only Mike and John responded to the call on the mailing list. The lack
of feedback may indicate that this is not important or that the value of
the document has not been understood. Maybe there have also been too
many other items on the plate (and given the list traffic I have seen in
the last few weeks on the OAuth list this wouldn't be such a far-fetched
thought).

Given the feedback I have received privately I have a hard time to
believe that there is no interest in these two items.

Here is what we will do: we will talk to the document authors in an
attempt to reposition the documents (and maybe change title, abstract
and intro). Then, we will come back to the group to gauge the reaction.

Ciao
Hannes & Derek