[OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-09.txt> (JWT Response for OAuth Token Introspection) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 21 August 2020 15:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
CC: oauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response@ietf.org, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com, oauth@ietf.org, rdd@cert.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <159802288149.12737.11570006487802113668@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:14:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/qVXSTPTZyZCilHC5ypUUDnT4ZSg>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-09.txt> (JWT Response for OAuth Token Introspection) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG
(oauth) to consider the following document: - 'JWT Response for OAuth Token
Introspection'
  <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-09.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-09-04. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This specification proposes an additional JSON Web Token (JWT)
   secured response for OAuth 2.0 Token Introspection.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Torsten Lodderstedt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Torsten Lodderstedt
[OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-intro… The IESG
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Denis
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Denis
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Dick Hardt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Justin Richer
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Mike Jones
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Torsten Lodderstedt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Justin Richer
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf… Brian Campbell
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Dick Hardt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Justin Richer
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Dick Hardt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Denis
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Neil Madden
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Jeff Craig
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Dick Hardt
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Neil Madden
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-i… Benjamin Kaduk
[OAUTH-WG] Towards an RFC Errata to RFC 7662 ? Denis
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Towards an RFC Errata to RFC 7662 ? Justin Richer
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Towards an RFC Errata to RFC 7662 ? Manger, James
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Towards an RFC Errata to RFC 7662 ? Benjamin Kaduk