[OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 and RFC6749

nov matake <nov@matake.jp> Mon, 07 January 2013 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <nov@matake.jp>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AF621F86AC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 03:54:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fx+e90BpSlKV for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 03:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f53.google.com (mail-da0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1520221F853C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 03:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x6so8632289dac.40 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=LJ4sml1GNO5Cop5DY4nPUlVCHutOujeE282TO1OvSmM=; b=hnISxNJ0sHzlYZ+Ed88tDrNb9XqIwhrwF9A0iaSu9JflkYoF6sysaN2t/Bnk/ccW7u Otj2Jb0JmxyW8DKqGqXYZznAcd+dTPYXrzqJZkD9k7YsxoF5UcAiD7/BkLKJKh3ygfJk QU17/fy0/tGHcY/gShv+FUK42khgtAhuRpzRk5xuep2p2Q5zzDcLjVaQbTJXa/2jf5+9 +xcPzLQFsYVZ6l+CBTwNpD+CvWIhNt4zWkPpE8YtTPIBq3oxppn0JNnmf+BkCdYVHac/ JClAWGVU03nEkHESBMJ5ve9ilYL7CKcRs7CX1/MNM754b2dyuNodQnKOuHsfWgtDPxlP oh1Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.82.162 with SMTP id j2mr177207175pay.13.1357559643370; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (z195031.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp. [110.4.195.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1sm38621117pav.6.2013.01.07.03.54.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:54:02 -0800 (PST)
From: nov matake <nov@matake.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BCAB65A4-22B4-4B61-A3F8-4D85AD24E594"
Message-Id: <315782BC-0135-4A0C-8541-F0A002B9C30F@matake.jp>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:53:59 +0900
To: "WG oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSLpQRO5LPLnDnw3cbgacQeOEsf4BAQ5XFQcXDUPPjM4LG20N2EziV+UNmt1NV5IeL0lCH
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 and RFC6749
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:54:04 -0000

Hi all,

I couldn't understand why "their" became "the third party's" in the diff between draft31 and RFC6749 below.

===
Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third-party third party
without revoking access to all third-parties, third parties, and must do so by
changing their the third party's password.

(from http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=rfc6749)
===

I read "their" as "resource owners'".
Is this typo, or am I missing some point?

Thanks

nov