Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC7591 (6619)

Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Wed, 23 June 2021 20:30 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210623044819.37AF0F407FE@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:30:25 -0400
Cc: disaacs@surveymonkey.com, ietf@justin.richer.org, mbj@microsoft.com, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, maciej.machulak@gmail.com, phil.hunt@yahoo.com, oauth@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <976EB106-F26F-4EBB-9247-4F731A99C098@amsl.com>
References: <20210623044819.37AF0F407FE@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/rMAUI4JMIEHGmWT6c6pS1JyLa7o>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC7591 (6619)
Precedence: list

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted.  A copy has been forwarded to webmaster@tools.ietf.org.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf


> On Jun 23, 2021, at 12:48 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7591,
> "OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6619
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Rejected
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Dave Isaacs <disaacs@surveymonkey.com>
> Date Reported: 2021-06-22
> Rejected by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)
> 
> Section: 2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> token_endpoint_auth_method
>      String indicator of the requested authentication method for the
>      token endpoint.  Values defined by this specification are:
> 
>      *  "none": The client is a public client as defined in OAuth 2.0,
>         Section 2.1, and does not have a client secret.
> 
>      *  "client_secret_post": The client uses the HTTP POST parameters
>         as defined in OAuth 2.0, Section 2.3.1.
> 
>      *  "client_secret_basic": The client uses HTTP Basic as defined in
>         OAuth 2.0, Section 2.3.1.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Text unchanged. It is the links that are incorrect.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The links that are present in each bullet—to Section 2.1, and to Section 2.3.1 (twice)—link internally to the current RFC (RFC 7591) when they are supposed to link to the OAuth 2.0 RFC (RFC 6749).
> --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
> Errata reports are for the official version(s) of the document as published by the RFC Editor.  Prior to RFC 8650 the official version is the plain text copy; the html version with links is the result of running a script over the text copy, and so the "wrong link" here is more properly a bug in the script than an error in the RFC.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7591 (draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-30)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
> Publication Date    : July 2015
> Author(s)           : J. Richer, Ed., M. Jones, J. Bradley, M. Machulak, P. Hunt
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC7591 (6619) RFC Errata System
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC7591 (6619) Megan Ferguson
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC7591 (6619) Hony Habesha