[OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make RedirectURI optional
Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 33E9FE0746 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 27 May 2011 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.723
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjLZ+STQ0PjQ for
<oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325AEE0711 for <oauth@ietf.org>;
Fri, 27 May 2011 14:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) by
TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:08:26 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.57]) by
TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi id
14.01.0289.008; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:08:26 -0700
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on action item to make RedirectURI optional
Thread-Index: Acwcsi+yhhFkBPRtRnyKZ3zOMHAQgw==
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:25 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394338105183@TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.74]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394338105183TK5EX14MBXC203r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make RedirectURI optional
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>,
<mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
<mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:28 -0000
The minutes from the special meeting included:
TODO: Eran to add extensibility language for this based on requirements.
- "RedirectURI" should be optional
TODO: Eran to send mail to the list proposing language changes to either change this from REQUIRED to OPTIONAL and add clarifying language, or leave as required and add a pre-defined value for "we're not actually using this".
Is this proposed change just limited to section 4.5? It seems to make sense to have redirect_uri be optional in section 4.1.3 as well (access token request using grant_type authorization code). Since this request is made directly from the client to the authorization server, I don't see why this would be required. For at least some implementations of the 3-legged flow, it would make sense to not have this be a requirement.
Comments?
Thanks,
-- Mike
- [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Redire… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Doug Tangren
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Doug Tangren
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on action item to make Re… Torsten Lodderstedt