Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
David Waite <david@alkaline-solutions.com> Fri, 26 February 2021 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <david@alkaline-solutions.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFEF3A0C28; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:36:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alkaline-solutions.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gq9G8G4ZB9qA; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:36:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from caesium6.alkaline.solutions (caesium6.alkaline.solutions [157.230.133.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F013A0C23; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:36:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by caesium6.alkaline.solutions (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D83B120511C; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 21:36:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alkaline-solutions.com; s=dkim; t=1614375365; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XzNa/FeuwVfR8Bay5xW5Z/Cz6ylpXzhPFHfObgrQKl4=; b=j26VsexMM9UZWirBA10U4IbT/ggf3nhYnW5r733RIWigsepWklxR3l9ubbNp745821IJ3d lO+mSD+QnSWXVBCpZvWxOEW6ylKrKGZQGmQAvIWlcy/EZQ8A7vuAbVJlbTPTY3BQhqARyF 6uh2YXI9zZZX5egu6EQ0TvS4Lasqf2w=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: David Waite <david@alkaline-solutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGBSGjqE4XKQmx2B8Lvh4faazfZPYqAYBy2NhSrewaBmEEBzpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:36:02 -0700
Cc: Warren Parad <wparad=40rhosys.ch@dmarc.ietf.org>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A4ABDE3-7175-4E5B-8807-437EE3CE427D@alkaline-solutions.com>
References: <CAMm+LwgbK3HYDjSHnTN3f6hWSQCQrEjHLNn6z0JpfY7hdxaQpg@mail.gmail.com> <A8128346-B557-472F-B94F-8F624F955FCE@manicode.com> <eb2eaaa7-7f7e-4170-ab87-1cc1fdd3359b@www.fastmail.com> <CAJot-L0PS_3LxEkC-jd1aqXDdYF+z8BajSs4Rhx3LgRPn6wkdQ@mail.gmail.com> <DAB127D7-809F-4EC2-A043-9B15E2DB8E07@tzi.org> <CAJot-L1e8GegjXjADRQ87tGqnSREoO4bEKLX+kPkZFsQpevGQA@mail.gmail.com> <66be0ffe-a638-45a0-ba05-1585ea02e6bf@www.fastmail.com> <CAJot-L2KO2dOzZQJJeB1kbk6_KTQwUYUsoJOoRt=9maynS1jZg@mail.gmail.com> <121f52be-4747-45f3-ad75-79fa2f693d75@beta.fastmail.com> <E84B4446-5F74-402B-8071-A1164EF0B02C@mit.edu> <6b5d0e34-340f-4f93-83ef-817d4624ec7d@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAPLh0AMfncjJ0iaZ5gmzrh1D0Z7WCOtG-+6GZkmzfQuAttsBtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPLh0AMEnbak8=6boESQCgTd=Au4V9O=wCqGCz5qEU-d3y0g5g@mail.gmail.com> <6E2CD5EE-55D9-403A-835D-032ECA39CBFB@mit.edu> <CAJot-L1x_AxjQAH7uJ+GsW1jcc93b8ijJ7uyiVRRDZtZf=NXCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBSGjqE4XKQmx2B8Lvh4faazfZPYqAYBy2NhSrewaBmEEBzpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Authentication-Results: caesium6.alkaline.solutions; auth=pass smtp.auth=david@alkaline-solutions.com smtp.mailfrom=david@alkaline-solutions.com
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/sB7VsD-p21T0eEZ1X3B-sNWpHKI>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 21:36:10 -0000
> On Feb 26, 2021, at 9:32 AM, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote: > The point is that basically nobody uses it because they don't want to allow arbitrary client registration at their ASs. That's likely due to a combination of pre-registration being the default model in OAuth for so long (the Dynamic Client Registration draft was published several years after OAuth 2.0), as well as how large corporations have decided to run their ASs where they want to have (what feels like) more control over the things talking to their servers. Do you disagree that this gives them control over which things talk to their servers? FWIW my personal mental model here is pretty simple: With users, there are services you provide anonymously and services you provide only to registered/authenticated/trusted parties for various reasons. Once you are delegating user access, you still have many of the same reasons to provide access to anonymous or registered/authenticated/trusted delegates. Dynamic registration arriving later and requiring additional complexity has unfortunately encouraged registration in use cases where anonymous clients might have been acceptable, but shifting the timelines or complexity balance would not have changed business needs for authentication and trust of delegates. Omitting registration would have caused businesses to use other protocols that met their needs. If AS’s are only getting what feels like proper control for their business needs, we should attempt to give them the actual control they require. -DW
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing an Au… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Evert Pot
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JMAP's experience with proposing a… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [OAUTH-WG] Building Real Internet Platforms Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Larry Masinter
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Jim Manico
- [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Jim Willeke
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Jim Willeke
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Tim Bray
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Michael Richardson
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Phillip Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Seán Kelleher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Seán Kelleher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… ST GERMAIN
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Evert Pot
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Evert Pot
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Tim Bray
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- [OAUTH-WG] How to tell people... Was: We appear t… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Christian Huitema
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… David Waite
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Jeff Craig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Vittorio Bertola