IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: [apps-discuss] APPS Area review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-14

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 12 December 2011 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C301721F8B84 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:07:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.974
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.974 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zk1E7Slj02Rz for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D32E621F8B7E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:07:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 17:07:44 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 12 Dec 2011 18:07:44 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/8WwcWPwr8T58cxBbtSgfksVvaFV63cTsb4q3IzM Rc37kKg07LC3xg
Message-ID: <4EE634DE.4000902@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:07:42 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F75F103@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F75F103@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: [apps-discuss] APPS Area review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-14
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:07:46 -0000

Mike,

On 2011-12-12 17:51, Mike Jones wrote:
> ...
> This parameter definition was a result of significant working group
> discussion and reflects a solid consensus position. Using the quoted
 > ...

I have to object to this summary. If there was consensus, it was rough 
at best.

Essentially, the two of us disagreed, and nobody else said anything. So 
I'd characterize the current text as the editor's preference, not any 
kind of WG consensus.

Further note that the current text is at odds with recommendations from 
a spec it normatively references (HTTPbis P7), so this issue will come 
up again during IETF Last Call.

Best regards, Julian

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status