Re: [OAUTH-WG] A Proposal for Dynamic Registration

[Leif Johansson <[e-mail]>]

On 08/06/2013 11:18 PM, Justin Richer wrote:

<snip>
>  - OAuth Dynamic Registration
>  - SCIM-based OAuth Dynamic Registration
>  - Software Statements for OAuth Dynamic Registration
>

This thread makes me think we should break out the EXPERIMENTAL
track: spin two or more proposed solutions as EXPERIMENTAL. Let the
various groups do what they're gona do (which they'll do anyway) and
the the chips fall where they may.

Tony is right in interpreting the discussions in Berlin as quite fractured.
Pushing for standards track seems premature.

OTOH the transition from EXPERIMENTAL to STANDARDS TRACK can
be as quick as a couple of I-Ds describing the outcome of the
implementation and deployment work that will happen anyway (as
you so correctly observe) after which the WG decides how to move
forward.

Since bb+ and openidc will do dynreg anyway the document track
doesn't really matter which means the usual "vendors won't implement
unless its a real RFC"-argument doesn't apply here anyway.

        Cheers Leif