IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 16 December 2011 23:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4B021F85EF; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:47:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nIff8pfq2VA; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7E521F88B7; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBGNlOk9010473; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:47:29 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1324079251; bh=lZIRqqIo+ccL0sMP1lfnCgZ5qwE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=KT0gVt+5PCsUhtGcZVvE8GPjpNjAQi722D5fRIltGZeEglC+CHagNyKBcUIo1Hq6O FniIoAOKoXN+X7vjF7RwflO+LPAFaV2AsVH5v+grBJ3it1hb5ebTi0/mjITt14uvnd vOdm3XbCL/VWQIHGQNoyeALjhSVDCM2iadTd22cs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111216152046.0b4cbbc0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:46:26 -0800
To: oauth@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F763122@TK5EX14MBXC283.re dmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F763122@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:48:39 -0800
Cc: appsdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:47:35 -0000

At 18:13 14-12-2011, Mike Jones wrote:
>Any objections to posting the updated Bearer draft incorporating the 
>results of the APPS Area review and the TLS requirements?

Mark Nottingham followed up on his review [1].  If this working group 
considers that the concerns raised have been addressed, I gather that 
it ok for me to raise them as issues during the Last Call for 
draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08052.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03805.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email