IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4024)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 24 June 2014 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00341B27A0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XA4L1ZR2hkma for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C03C1A0100 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F2B39180203; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20140624201100.F2B39180203@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:11:00 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/w8u11jTf7QHTHQAXu7mB4zO506I
Cc: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4024)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:12:40 -0000

FYI, this report has been removed because it was junk.

RFC Editor/ar

On Jun 24, 2014, at 2:56 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749,
> "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=4024
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Ebrahim Jodeiri dallalan <el3rahim@yahoo.com>
> 
> Section: s
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> s
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> s
> 
> Notes
> -----
> s
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : D. Hardt, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email