Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite)
Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Fri, 11 June 2010 20:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711D3A6A4A for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.025
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.952, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sS9u+SnXVWS for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4383A6767 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.13]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o5BKmG42028947 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1276289297; bh=ZaUeOBuWhtTbYffnkSQepZP+f50=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=X5gkYt7yUFdSCC29JN4aWK7pRbzlRIZ2yDwGBiVR2WDXZD7ewLyl60l+NUqJ38IhZ G1UYgNxgcrKE7/rGFjxbg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JxT5Hftyyr6BDycxtO7e1R/b0x11Gm/Qlu5idmF+fNPy9KIr1ByTgzNyWWXnHYE4C o2fHS5vfuhXdi7gDlOzIQ==
Received: from pva18 (pva18.prod.google.com [10.241.209.18]) by hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o5BKmEDp005416 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:15 -0700
Received: by pva18 with SMTP id 18so1007489pva.14 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.152.12 with SMTP id z12mr1685882wfd.71.1276289294122; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.124.13 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EAF76BC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EAF76BC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:47:54 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwF01iyhC7ua35scgMIPqVv3J5d_Z1lHSTXLUo@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:48:16 -0000
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: > Draft -07 represents a major rearrangement of the document. I still have a lot of work to do but wanted to share my progress and get some general feedback. The draft includes a few normative language changes but the main focus is on the document structure and how the architecture is explained. > > Changes include: > > o Removed device profile. > o Added verification code support to user-agent flow. > o Removed multiple formats support, leaving JSON as the only format. > o Changed assertion "assertion_format" parameter to "assertion_type". > o Removed "type" parameter from token endpoint. It would be really useful if each request had a unique type, now we are back to guessing what is requested, like in WRAP. One small error that I noticed: section "5.1.4. Refresh Token" is not listing client_id and client_secret as optional parameters. In general I found previous versions much easier to read and understand, but maybe I just need more time... Marius
- [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Andrew Arnott
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Christian Scholz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Andrew Arnott
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Brian Eaton