Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: OAuth Security Topics

Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@willeke.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D197812957E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:30:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=willeke-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBOuwYcJMYWo for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x232.google.com (mail-yb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0170C129446 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 123so612411ybe.3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:30:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=willeke-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=r2V6dIjbwLQXB/R207gsovMu7U3k6oRSwmAWEO1MvaU=; b=bmeH+2gBSefTvY15jwSpvHCiOU3vn4RR+zNe6umsQufx0p0x8y/rgT9j99nqXnBpG5 b7GgFPn+1atHOCWaMOYQOecWdV92uMdjrIboNPSFnugq1Q/2ssy4t3dPhpG2etgkYV0R 3OPhyFFTTLKJW9kJOP8pUbZUsBg4aUPwDhfSYTqpVQcUZM+ZZ93Ti6Do5drFRS9qm/Zb QJpNGacZhzxD2+Wiew7k0Z6oeRo0wtsdeS+ee1ugj7PpdOH7UsMdcWLZr6peXmdlZOvz 8wp+REOVgm785UHdIfhwfE+XJ07FzRyfqafhPAiqfKVcsDinD4ryS2wjXQZQ0TdiMQH2 +WKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=r2V6dIjbwLQXB/R207gsovMu7U3k6oRSwmAWEO1MvaU=; b=Sl/i4oLJveBgRNxiaf6DwAWISgFOVJMCQldJvyfT90seP2XFquA9pRxGVNuap4I2D7 f/egkDVVXKdPXrq5MZfGfeaDPb4RDudC7FNDL2T/nMnV2SP4yF5CwkK6aWpKHUJVnCVX ftJ1lJf2qpIst6ty4vwBFbpbu9e79uZzcw6NgkKYanBSQexYkf1KjgW285FzU671UNa0 WoLuZzrXK8tm1BJ2Wj1Gz8BWrBz9IUQRKNSmCer9EH56RHnACyTtAYRwlQxs5L76iyrc g+qa4XmJDEhkuvs0oFsGWuoRPpFgGry01bTW+DNMb9KPodGAoH3aiaOCLUBd5QaACYX5 6cvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKdOPX+sNUs5gzkDqkNEbskLORjNUQ/BHXf9ZuaAUldX3ytP0KGnwKO+WvNddjWBbJvHIeT2SvdJUfM8qb+
X-Received: by 10.37.208.196 with SMTP id h187mr4420081ybg.198.1486074650078; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:30:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.26.5 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:30:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <541A5105-B963-4FA4-94E4-D794A73B3358@ve7jtb.com>
References: <ae7d8912-2a13-4d19-62b4-0b1d1106a555@gmx.net> <541A5105-B963-4FA4-94E4-D794A73B3358@ve7jtb.com>
From: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 17:30:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAB3ntOupmVPnW4D2QXfJ1rjbMnF-8T9hvcy5cC6EaTDawyuA_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c055382a10a60054793b774
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/wwkrGEANMBNB0TToJEZcY0AsyBg>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: OAuth Security Topics
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 22:30:53 -0000

+!
I agree this is needed.

--
-jim
Jim Willeke

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:33 PM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>; wrote:

> I am in favour of adoption.
> > On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:09 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>;
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is the call for adoption of the 'OAuth Security Topics' document
> > following the positive call for adoption at the last IETF
> > meeting in Seoul.
> >
> > Here is the document:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-security-topics-00
> >
> > The intention with this document is to have a place to collect
> > discussions and conclusions around OAuth 2.0 security and to reference
> > the actual solution specifications.
> >
> > Please let us know by Feb 16th whether you accept / object to the
> > adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
> > working group.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes & Derek
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>