IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-revocation

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 03 February 2013 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD60221F86A8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXlE2NVuKVAj for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAEB21F8689 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.30]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mgqx4-1UNw4K3vMm-00M3BT for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:10:05 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2013 13:10:04 -0000
Received: from a88-115-219-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.200]) [88.115.219.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2013 14:10:04 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/lbqE+e4blNqCDYFyXs0gG7OM4Ny9I20muOW4pfB Y676UKSEx/ZDCA
Message-ID: <510E61AB.20808@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:10:03 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
References: <510E5FB5.10803@lodderstedt.net>
In-Reply-To: <510E5FB5.10803@lodderstedt.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:10:06 -0000

Hi Torsten,


On 02/03/2013 03:01 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
> - invalid_token error code: I propose to use the new error code
> "invalid_parameter" (as suggested by Peter and George). I don't see the
> need to register it (see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10604.html) but
> would like to get your advice.

If you define a new error code (which 'invalid_parameter' is) then it 
would make sense to register it.
The mail exchange you reference refers to re-using an existing error 
code (namely invalid_request).

Ciao
Hannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email