IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A404321F85FC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGMm1WTPNd7V for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4843B21F85D4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail122-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.251) by DB3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.3.84.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:47:55 +0000
Received: from mail122-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4574C009C; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:47:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -24
X-BigFish: VS-24(zzbb2dI9371I146fIc85dh1432Izz1202hzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail122-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail122-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1340308073342089_31008; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:47:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.234]) by mail122-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B1F1C004A; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:47:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.3.87.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:47:48 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.53]) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:49:13 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02
Thread-Index: AQHNTt/sWKdca/SRw0Gp10lpJtZuBZcFFX4AgAAEYoCAABAKAIAAASMAgAAFEZs=
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:49:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436656365A@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <4FE1C16D.6010602@cs.tcd.ie> <F606CA9D-9DB6-460E-BE7A-BC989A4AB25F@gmx.net> <CAC4RtVCrQ9yG6V_XwczXo_FvCkyCXJDfmrb-p0UX3KRW7Edx9A@mail.gmail.com> <4CD0B85C-C88D-4B52-81E4-5D53A25E60EF@cs.tcd.ie>, <CAC4RtVBEjDeoJzbxGwkTHsk2REv8+6GELywR7Sv-dsRm8LGw2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBEjDeoJzbxGwkTHsk2REv8+6GELywR7Sv-dsRm8LGw2A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436656365ATK5EX14MBXC283r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:49:25 -0000

I'd argue that the registration regime chosen should be flexible enough to permit OASIS or OpenID specs to use it. Otherwise, as someone else pointed, people will work around the limitation by using unregistered values - which helps no one.

-- Mike

________________________________
From: Barry Leiba
Sent: 6/21/2012 12:31 PM
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02

>> Stephen:
>> Yeah, I'm not sure Standards Track is needed.
>
> On this bit: I personally don't care, except that we don't have to do it twice
> because someone later on thinks the opposite and wins that argument, which
> I'd rather not have at all  (My one-track mind:-) Doing the 4 week last call means
> once is enough. But I'm ok with whatever the WG want.

Well, it's not a 4-week LC, but a 2-week one.  Anyway, yes, I see your
point, and I've done that with other documents.  Better to make it
Standards Track for now, note in the shepherd writeup that
Informational is probably OK, and let the IESG decide.

b
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email