IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: [IANA #596671] Protocol Action: 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31.txt)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 08 August 2012 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8837821F8550 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NlqBh+rkUlC1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC13021F854A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (unknown [67.177.192.224]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3626A4006D; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:27:58 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5021C098.3090606@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:27:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
References: <rt-3.8.8-6133-1344386066-1919.596671-7-0@icann.org> <825EF775-C6BC-4630-AE00-4063C6458A46@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <825EF775-C6BC-4630-AE00-4063C6458A46@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: [IANA #596671] Protocol Action: 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31.txt)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:27:56 -0000

Putting the parameters in alphabetical order would make the page more
readable, but other than that it seems fine.

On 8/7/12 6:52 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
> Would appreciate a few others checking to make sure the IANA entries are
> valid. 
> 
> -- Dick
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> *From: *"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org
>> <mailto:drafts-approval@iana.org>>
>> *Subject: **[IANA #596671] Protocol Action: 'The OAuth 2.0
>> Authorization Framework' to Proposed Standard
>> (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31.txt) *
>> *Date: *August 7, 2012 5:34:26 PM PDT
>> *Cc: *dick.hardt@gmail.com <mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com>,
>> oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org>,
>> oauth-ads@tools.ietf.org <mailto:oauth-ads@tools.ietf.org>
>> *Reply-To: *drafts-approval@iana.org <mailto:drafts-approval@iana.org>
>>
>> Dear Author:
>>
>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>>
>> We have completed the IANA Actions for RFC-to-be
>> draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31
>>
>> IANA has created the OAuth Access Token Types, OAuth Parameters, OAuth
>> Authorization Endpoint Response Types, and OAuth Extensions Errors
>> registries at
>>
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters
>>
>>
>> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As
>> soon as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor
>> that this document's IANA Actions are complete.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Amanda Baber
>> ICANN/IANA
>>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status