Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret"
Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 13 July 2010 21:05 UTC
Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C020A3A6A45 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8ce6lU+FAxy for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526243A69F1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o6DL5PYK003869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:05:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.244.39.28] (faynberg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.39.28]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o6DL5OkY026006; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:05:24 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4C3CD51C.7050405@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:05:32 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>
References: <97BD2762-F147-4774-9557-AD478338B348@jkemp.net> <C861F32E.371BA%eran@hueniverse.com> <D24C564ACEAD16459EF2526E1D7D605D0C9E7F3576@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG> <AANLkTimKH9OL3zq91lTCK8_EuCefcifPfqslb24zytv7@mail.gmail.com> <93F20A70-3133-4C5A-BE15-9C85F1D42787@jkemp.net> <AANLkTikd1o-pS24OcaREB98ePUdJDcythnO-1WwV_L2c@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimCOZs-VlhX-pyhUUa5rdIsnUEDgSNZX5MprQRs@mail.gmail.com> <4C3CCF58.6010102@alcatel-lucent.com> <AANLkTimjvjcTEbR-sC4q8G8oC3vh5k4mPOMI71XD3tf4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjvjcTEbR-sC4q8G8oC3vh5k4mPOMI71XD3tf4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret"
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:05:22 -0000
YES!!! Brian, could you please add this? Igor Brian Eaton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Igor Faynberg > <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > >> In this case, the term "capability" MUST be defined up front. The word >> "capability" seems to carry a much broader meaning than password... >> > > It has a standard definition we can reference. From > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2828.txt > > $ capability > (I) A token, usually an unforgeable data value (sometimes called a > "ticket") that gives the bearer or holder the right to access a > system resource. Possession of the token is accepted by a system > as proof that the holder has been authorized to access the > resource named or indicated by the token. (See: access control > list, credential, digital certificate.) > > (C) This concept can be implemented as a digital certificate. > (See: attribute certificate.) >
- [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" John Kemp
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" John Kemp
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" John Kemp
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" John Kemp
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" John Kemp
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Evan Gilbert
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] "shared symmetric secret" Evan Gilbert