Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
hdknr hidelafoglia <hidelafoglia@gmail.com> Tue, 21 September 2010 19:38 UTC
Return-Path: <hidelafoglia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE673A672F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zIZciGG3rry for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576EB3A67B1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwi5 with SMTP id 5so128015pwi.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4yu2rcCj+oA+PbTz1ZlHNZWsIJYbtiDhvWi9nBjBc1U=; b=W0LVX0KjHLdNUeVFlXa1CSSYAJdhkmKVkcCGFhMIYt2HAr1SFRMu49qStDlgp+qvTY RLVhSDPAa+9kXs/PlijmTTUMSTPbCHlxGNODDyj/MutqQUfpkgr5s690NGSK8/DHQMy9 H7KLSqUR/oxxA6axVT70iNkJdiWy9S8uqmtZc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RB4YKDDn0bhQGEjC0uRJ5xkIfNr7GMZbwe4QJ+yFI6GdTyYdKOQxVqooE3hXdu7Ph4 0WsV/i7ImD2t0UVGQP9+l9vaVnKHsL0uSR3r0JcI+xZB4xiG+0/Pvw+GmtYNA3FL4t7z tV6o67UJKGMHWljrcgxggoIsGwEuBurubBNME=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.74.8 with SMTP id w8mr12554334waa.27.1285097911927; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.170.196 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7C01E631FF4B654FA1E783F1C0265F8C62D263BB@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <AANLkTikSKX8jisucEbZOUnkGYUz0DnBSB_KWXGM3bJcS@mail.gmail.com> <7C01E631FF4B654FA1E783F1C0265F8C62D263BB@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:38:31 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=3o4_vmQQUGCRYP2gE_-Ar+oKx0bCyBtnGhCPO@mail.gmail.com>
From: hdknr hidelafoglia <hidelafoglia@gmail.com>
To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:38:13 -0000
Hi, If Crypto segment has a switch parameters of encryption or signature, JSON Token seems to handle encrypted token as well as signed token. --- hdknr 2010/8/31 Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>: > BTW, Nat and I, as mentioned below, are talking. Here is my current draft. > Please keep in mind that it's really just a set of notes trying to capture > all the issues involved in creating a secure token format so it's a bit > dense. My hope is that once all the issues are captured it can be completely > re-written to be in something that looks more like English and is easier for > actual implementers to follow. But for now I think it gives a good sense of > the some of the security challenges in creating a secure token format. > > Yaron > > > > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Nat Sakimura > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:50 AM > To: oauth > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 > > > > Hi. > > > > It has been a few weeks since then I volunteered to do this work. > > I have written up to this pre 00 draft then have been doing some reality > checks on some script languages etc. > > > > No. This pre-00 draft is far from being feature complete. > > I still need to copy and paste the Magic Signatures text etc. > > Also, I should add how this spec is being used in some of the major flows. > > > > However, since I will not be able to work on it this week, I thought it > would be worthwhile to share this early draft so that you have some clarity > into the progress. > > > > Apparently, Yaron has been working on it as well. We will compare the notes > and try to merge, I hope. > > > > So, here it is! > > > > #For those of you who have seen the private draft, it has not been changed > since July 31. > > > > Best, > > > > =nat > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Yaron Goland
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 hdknr hidelafoglia
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 hdknr hidelafoglia
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Yaron Goland
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00 Mike Jones