From nobody Sat Sep 11 04:08:12 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63CC3A0ECC for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:08:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=danielfett.de Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9MVSHgxkFFb for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d3f.me (redstone.d3f.me [5.9.29.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADA53A0ECB for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by d3f.me (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C3B681286D; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:07:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1631358476; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8S6EbwSnb2t3VlinxLs24ukD678fC5fud39nsG5AVkM=; b=PS9klvW1AMjD0jiRCiWM4NWSqiSSrea8efAfUmwxJMcCcZHa9CvXwXKSPEjQK1oxKnAQbP ae2hMn6QYlNfmbkS29kcw2/J6EKez1DcSSD2ac01aVmefBJv+UxIjZkPzjPYpsPMfL32if A76r4FltvoYLLxC1GQQUa/Wl7QYJ4QY= To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef , oauth Cc: Karsten Meyer zu Selhausen References: From: Daniel Fett Message-ID: <804c44b0-afc3-49c5-943f-add0f3aa9762@danielfett.de> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:07:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E7A9DAA90C45177FC571C7ED" Content-Language: de-DE ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1631358476; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8S6EbwSnb2t3VlinxLs24ukD678fC5fud39nsG5AVkM=; b=WuH2F0UfSuMsRIvxdTzhplLhcR7IZjqXOPAERTsLEzPbXIh5tls7u9Wbt7ixeR6geuKl+D dP6jOBxxdE8gJS+WJHL/4nRJaM/Sb6aLTURbDx15fdRDNlJJ9F1dmkDzWmJY8jYq8wSwUN dp78K/8MyKtUnXRBF5I9BYIFswAI+W0= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=danielfett.de; t=1631358476; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MSBAMyMm45aqYjyfEFi9KX181RJj3DsbOPXbeObQSCE2u+V709TaFs5woQm+J1es3yeWmk auWQVWzptv8XYUMW2F0wqdNYgLytcMAIlLNo8W1CD2uhkvPjNzmkn/sES5H433cWssB9Zp nZoW57ql5DzT9aYjC2kJ/tZ88wbaepc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de Authentication-Results: d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de X-Spamd-Bar: -- Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosures - OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Issuer Identification X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: OAUTH WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:08:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E7A9DAA90C45177FC571C7ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Rifaat, not sure why, but I totally missed that first email. Thanks for the reminder! I am not aware of any IPR related to the OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Issuer Identification draft. -Daniel Am 08.09.21 um 18:44 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef: > Karsten, Daniel, > > Any update on this? > > Regards, >  Rifaat > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:30 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > > wrote: > > Authors, > > As part of the shepherd write-up, all authors of the document must > confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for > full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have > already been filed. > > Please, reply to this email on the mailing list and indicate if > you are aware of any IPRs associated with this document. > > Regards, >  Rifaat > -- https://danielfett.de --------------E7A9DAA90C45177FC571C7ED Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Rifaat,

not sure why, but I totally missed that first email. Thanks for the reminder!

I am not aware of any IPR related to the OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Issuer Identification draft.

-Daniel

Am 08.09.21 um 18:44 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef:
Karsten, Daniel,

Any update on this?

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:30 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Authors,

As part of the shepherd write-up, all authors of the document must confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed.

Please, reply to this email on the mailing list and indicate if you are aware of any IPRs associated with this document.

Regards,
 Rifaat


-- 
https://danielfett.de
--------------E7A9DAA90C45177FC571C7ED--