[OAUTH-WG] Obsolete RFC editor's note for OAuth Bearer
Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 19:26 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1521721F86DF for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.210, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bw9l8n0rSbJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1917C21F86CE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail109-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.243) by CO1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.243.66.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:51 +0000
Received: from mail109-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54FB64015E; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -22
X-BigFish: VS-22(zzc85fh4015I199bIzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah107ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail109-co1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail109-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1344972408634804_13320; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.236]) by mail109-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971DD60004D; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by CO1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (10.243.66.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:48 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.132]) by TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.154]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:47 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Thread-Topic: Obsolete RFC editor's note for OAuth Bearer
Thread-Index: Ac16Ur6DBtMW1teoS9CfH+gHRhAkaQ==
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:47 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777A39@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.79]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366777A39TK5EX14MBXC283r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Obsolete RFC editor's note for OAuth Bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:26:53 -0000
At https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/writeup/, there's an RFC Editor's note that we've already addressed in edits to the spec. Could you change the editor's note to simply say "none" like https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2/writeup/ does? Thanks, -- Mike