IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Mark Mcgloin <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4D3A69AB; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65-VgTWT8EPo; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtagate7.uk.ibm.com (mtagate7.uk.ibm.com [194.196.100.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79793A6AFF; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.129]) by mtagate7.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o8RDjead011375; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:45:40 GMT
Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o8RDjZRx1024178; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:45:40 +0100
Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o8RDjZa3027964; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:45:35 -0600
Received: from d06ml093.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06ml093.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.104.171]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o8RDjYab027928; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:45:35 -0600
In-Reply-To: <9706DE2E-1691-48D1-BC8A-3AEEEAB5C6C4@gmail.com>
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com> <D01C840D-BA0A-42AE-A6C4-C43E6E84C2F2@gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1126BFB1574@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D45D80132@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <CD71CDA0-15FA-4860-87EA-BE9C4B6932E4@gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D45D80136@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTimKJGRBqXPiUVROYQNRhj0KPEp0C4K8KXqUHjsr@mail.gmail.com> <9706DE2E-1691-48D1-BC8A-3AEEEAB5C6C4@gmail.com>
X-KeepSent: A294CF0E:B3751FF2-802577AB:004B1913; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009
Message-ID: <OFA294CF0E.B3751FF2-ON802577AB.004B1913-802577AB.004B94D6@ie.ibm.com>
From: Mark Mcgloin <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:45:00 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML093/06/M/IBM(Release 8.0.2FP6|July 15, 2010) at 27/09/2010 14:45:01
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>, oauth-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:45:04 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:45:04 -0000

I have gone through Brian's wrap security considerations and will
incorporate them into the security considerations for OAuth 2 that Torsten
and I will compile. We can run it past Brian too

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/SecurityConsiderations/OAuthWRAP2.0SecurityConsiderations.pdf

Regards
Mark McGloin

Dick Hardt wrote on 27/09/2010 14:30


> wrt. another comment you had about security considerations, Brian Eaton
did write up a bunch of security considerations for WRAP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email