[OAUTH-WG] Re: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

[Michael Jones <[e-mail]>]

Hi Francesca,

Per my reply to Murray, the IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me.  It now says:

"The IANA escalation process is followed when the Designated Experts are not responsive within 14 days."

Thanks again for taking the time to review.

                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Jones
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 6:39 AM
To: Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

Thank you for reviewing the document, Francesca.  Would it be more appropriate to change the text to say the following?

"Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG for approval, per Section 4.10 of RFC 8126."

                                Best wishes,
                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 4:50 AM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for this document.

Many thanks to Mike Bishop for the HTTPDIR review.

One more IANA point. Section 8 states:

> Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than
> 21 days
can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the [e-mail] mailing list) for resolution.

Maybe it is me not being a native speaker, but it is not clear to me what is requested of the IESG. If the goal is to add a "IESG Approval" (see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126#section-4.10 ), then it should be stated clearly, and by the way I do not think that is a good idea. If it is escalation, then IANA already has procedures in place for that, and I don't think this text adds anything to that. Can you expand?