Re: [obscurity-interest] GNU Free Call

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Tue, 22 March 2011 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D33A693E for <obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVFkqJ6Mu90T for <obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mailb.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B1B3A6929 for <obscurity-interest@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:37:40 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.39) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.2; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:37:40 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.185]) by TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.39]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.002; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:37:39 -0700
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, "obscurity-interest@ietf.org" <obscurity-interest@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [obscurity-interest] GNU Free Call
Thread-Index: AQHL6E8+UwSik3q5QUeollajyEFtb5Q41QKg
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:37:38 +0000
Message-ID: <22F6318E46E26B498ABC828879B08D4F0E2BF3@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4C32EC9B-E2F6-4352-BE65-29E7D5CEEEA3@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C32EC9B-E2F6-4352-BE65-29E7D5CEEEA3@softarmor.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.123.12]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [obscurity-interest] GNU Free Call
X-BeenThere: obscurity-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of communications obscurity and real-time communications." <obscurity-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest>, <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/obscurity-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:obscurity-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest>, <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:36:12 -0000

> Not obscure, but at least slightly opaque:
> 
> http://planet.gnu.org/gnutelephony/?p=14
>
>
> Question: What could be done to reduce the "stand out", or "obviousness" of a SIPWitch node?

P2P SIP comes to mind. Especially if we can use a form of P2P that allows for "local" discovery, without sending traffic to central points.

-- Christian Huitema