Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face scheduling
Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> Fri, 18 March 2011 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
X-Original-To: obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D98D3A69D0 for <obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojm0TWp1Q-zk for <obscurity-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abenaki.wabanaki.net (abenaki.wabanaki.net [65.99.1.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2F73A69B2 for <obscurity-interest@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from limpet.local (cpe-67-255-5-237.twcny.res.rr.com [67.255.5.237]) by abenaki.wabanaki.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2IGM2FE021793; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:22:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net)
Message-ID: <4D83A0DC.80708@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:13:48 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Organization: wampumpeag
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
References: <CD18C9C4-C1A3-4D3E-B734-5DC9844FC914@softarmor.com> <4D839063.70302@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <AANLkTim_EmFWszP0qN7R11Y2kjYqADui1BYm-v=EDekZ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim_EmFWszP0qN7R11Y2kjYqADui1BYm-v=EDekZ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: obscurity-interest@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face scheduling
X-BeenThere: obscurity-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of communications obscurity and real-time communications." <obscurity-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest>, <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/obscurity-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:obscurity-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest>, <mailto:obscurity-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:12:26 -0000
As an alternative to continued guessing, perhaps you could share the particular definition(s) you have in mind. On 3/18/11 2:02 PM, Dean Willis wrote: > I confess I did not have that particular definition in mind, but it > certainly represents an interesting use case. > >> On Mar 18, 2011 12:03 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" >> <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net <mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>> wrote: >> >> I'm assuming that the phrase "counter-communication" refers to >> interaction at an institutional "counter", and sensitive data is >> communicated, e.g., personally identifying information and >> pharmaceutical prescriptions or banking identifiers, etc. >> >> Is this a correct assumption? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Eric >> >> On 3/16/11 9:04 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote: >> >> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. >> >> List address: obscurity-interest@ietf.org >> <mailto:obscurity-interest@ietf.org> >> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/obscurity-interest/ >> To subscribe: >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest >> >> Description: This list is for discussion of the requirements and >> technology for enabling communications, especially near or >> real-time, >> between persons subject to high levels of counter-communication >> interception. The requirements are believed to relate to >> privacy, data >> integrity, unlinkability, and the general intercept (lawful or >> otherwise) >> problem, which is broader than the "privacy" problem considered >> by IETF. >> This list intended to focus on practical requirement and >> actionable work >> rather than general theory. Discussion may lead to new protocol >> action, >> enhanced guidance for "security considerations" sections in IETF >> specifications, and further research inside or outside of the IETF. >> >> For additional information, please contact the list administrators. >> _______________________________________________ >> IETF-Announce mailing list >> IETF-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:IETF-Announce@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> obscurity-interest mailing list >> obscurity-interest@ietf.org <mailto:obscurity-interest@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest >
- [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face scheduli… Dean Willis
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Dean Willis
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Fearghas McKay
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Dean Willis
- Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face sche… Eric Brunner-Williams