IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my (our?) communication

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Wed, 02 September 2009 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BFB3A6D4E for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iej9ubmT6RuQ for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep21-int.chello.at (viefep21-int.chello.at [62.179.121.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCC23A6407 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge03.upc.biz ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090902222239.ETTK11480.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge03.upc.biz>; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:22:39 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge03.upc.biz with edge id byNd1c08q0FlQed03yNeJ0; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:22:39 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MiyFE-0001zP-Lg; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:24:00 +0200
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:24:00 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090902222400.GA6652@alinoe.com>
References: <20090831170006.GB15637@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908311108v5d8a2b72v45c759c6bf421971@mail.gmail.com> <20090831222934.GB29965@alinoe.com> <3a880e2c0908311606j16d2f75al478fe85345543e55@mail.gmail.com> <20090902125810.GA11930@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220909020651s5efbd9d4hf79dc3da306d2193@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b8ef0a220909020651s5efbd9d4hf79dc3da306d2193@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>, ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my (our?) communication
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:55:31 -0000

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 06:51:20AM -0700, Meadhbh Siobhan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Carlo Wood<carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think it's better if this group FAILS to create a working group
> > at this point. It is simply not working.
> >
> 
> Carlo.
> 
> If your objective is to have this group fail, let me ask you please to
> not participate.
> 
> -Sincerely,
> -Meadhbh Hamrick

I completely agree that if anyone has the objective to have this
group fail, then they better leave.

Obviously, that is NOT my objective.

What I meant was that this should be a collaborative community
thing. If we can't get agreement over something serious then
it is NOT a solution that one party walks away and the other
gets their way.

Sincerely,
Carlo Wood

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email