Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sat, 03 October 2009 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBA13A695C for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.509, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1+1e1Ml8Ib0a for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at (viefep14-int.chello.at [62.179.121.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AF03A63EB for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge01.upc.biz ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20091003222011.LFHU20477.viefep14-int.chello.at@edge01.upc.biz>; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:20:11 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge01.upc.biz with edge id oNL91c0590FlQed01NLAd3; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:20:11 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MuCyc-0004cd-EH; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:21:18 +0200
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:21:18 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <20091003222118.GA16290@alinoe.com>
References: <e0b04bba0909291751g157d2043g1c15e8d8ac417ccf@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0909300910t23131532i1719d2c86423fa41@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011434i13f890bfodd22cd15eef17697@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011457o5e757135rd9db7fc7f4a1389@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011613w6f25b684w1b0f2e8c7187b3de@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011632n3488ff6aqbf93edbda2a51637@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910012252v540dd170k4b81e30052e6c974@mail.gmail.com> <3a880e2c0910020932t5995c477qb0d798de1c2653f6@mail.gmail.com> <20091003192159.GA7474@alinoe.com> <e0b04bba0910031452o2a497effi57c4e92f8902b5df@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0910031452o2a497effi57c4e92f8902b5df@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:18:45 -0000

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:52:18PM +0100, Morgaine wrote:
> It's important to highlight (as you did) that issues such as age verification
> have no place in a worldwide IETF protocol standard, so while you provide a
> good example of policy variations among worlds, any such agreements are outside
> of the context of our protocol.

Not entirely... age verification is necessary in many countries with
what's going on in an SL-like world.

A RD cannot do the age-verification; that is a job for an AD.

However, I think it's the RD that needs to make the decision whether
or not a user is allowed in (based on its age), which in turn means
that the AD has to tell the RD if it knows the age, and if so, what
it is; hence, it should be part of the protocol.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>