Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision
Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Sat, 29 August 2009 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E90D53A69C8 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77MZTxIHlwIj for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com
[209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24383A6954 for
<ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so875199ewy.42 for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=HND+IGKbWXZ5tjO8aMiFUbwcFmb/w9u8QHGNY0CcUwU=;
b=dn9SW3y/UiGzO8Xpd6dBcwur2VIykgk6nunPg0eICCGwYrEHQZ1LvK3eLnq9Oodr3k
we2X7gQwaJ+h7obiv7fUd/SnhCZ/XEW6U5ZcjbXJC2RsoMnbXpKn1sV98Ynu56XgjgBu
fxi3HCowB/NfAg8H5GvkJl88jP0ovCatsTs28=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=Iec21zbxr9B4IC0CsOcX5ky4jstubzoajil7miXFD5UXPMpUttJFR+d1R384R0h5wg
gLHNTNy2Lo1YcD+4Xq59jGuLOBJj1TSLcVtpxiDYmlOI0f73wL/XFJu7ae5b4h/lcfrS
GO5B7SfQAva9Jbr+MEhJd8Ts2yXocXtHAWusc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr1106314ebd.7.1251506958551;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3a880e2c0908281127h6965f332na493007b032e5e93@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908281127h6965f332na493007b032e5e93@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:49:18 +0100
Message-ID: <e0b04bba0908281749g72411884h8f3e839a21743b30@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c177cb2cc4404723d2b83
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:49:16 -0000
> > To support the exegesis of the specifications, the group may define a > non-exhaustive set of non-normative policies protocol participants may > enforce. > I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry at this sentence in the 3rd paragraph, but one thing's certain, it doesn't help at all. In fact, the world would be a far better place without it. ;-) I would normally give reasons, but in this case the sentence is just so far beyond the pale that with a bit of luck it'll just disappear without further ado through universal revulsion. ;-) Morgaine. Plain English Campaign.
- [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Dave CROCKER
- [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Charles Krinke
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Suzy Deffeyes
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Dan Olivares
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Charles Krinke
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Suzy Deffeyes
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revisi… Morgaine